BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

24 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Dec 18, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-021· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA findings #2015-021: Telecom company responsible for erroneous debt collection calls

A telecommunications company

A telecommunications company erroneously continued to report a debt to a credit-reporting agency after the complainant was discharged from bankruptcy. This impacted the complainant's credit score and led to unwanted debt collection calls. The company investigated, corrected its records, notified the credit-reporting agency, and ensured the debt collection calls would cease.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

PIPEDA findings #2015-021: Telecom company responsible for erroneous debt collection calls

Dec 18, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-021
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A telecommunications company erroneously continued to report a debt to a credit-reporting agency after the complainant was discharged from bankruptcy. This impacted the complainant's credit score and led to unwanted debt collection calls. The company investigated, corrected its records, notified the credit-reporting agency, and ensured the debt collection calls would cease.

Key Issues
  • Accuracy and up-to-dateness of personal information
  • Disclosure of personal information to third parties
  • Appropriate use of personal information in decision-making
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Dec 15, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-014· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-014: Pension and benefit provider agrees to revamp authentication and address-change procedures after misdirected mailings

A pension and benefit provider

An employee complained that her pension and benefit provider improperly disclosed her unique identifier, failed to keep her address accurate, and did not implement adequate safeguards. An individual with the same name was mistakenly given the complainant's ID number, leading to her address being changed. Consequently, five mailings containing sensitive information were sent to the wrong address, and the complainant lost her life insurance coverage due to missed forms. The provider corrected the error and reinstated coverage.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-014: Pension and benefit provider agrees to revamp authentication and address-change procedures after misdirected mailings

Dec 15, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-014
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An employee complained that her pension and benefit provider improperly disclosed her unique identifier, failed to keep her address accurate, and did not implement adequate safeguards. An individual with the same name was mistakenly given the complainant's ID number, leading to her address being changed. Consequently, five mailings containing sensitive information were sent to the wrong address, and the complainant lost her life insurance coverage due to missed forms. The provider corrected the error and reinstated coverage.

Key Issues
  • Disclosure of unique identifier to a third party without consent.
  • Failure to maintain accurate client address information.
  • Inadequate safeguards against unauthorized disclosure and modification of personal information.
  • Improper authentication of caller identity.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActDiscontinued
Dec 2, 2015Discontinued Case Summary #2015-001· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Discontinued Case Summary #2015-001: Real estate management company responds fairly and reasonably to surveillance camera concerns

A real estate management company

An individual complained that a real estate management company failed to obtain consent for the collection of his personal information through video surveillance at a shopping mall. The complainant alleged inadequate signage and over-collection of his information when a camera was focused on him. The company responded by posting new signage and providing additional training to staff. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner discontinued the investigation, finding the company’s response to be fair and reasonable.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActDiscontinued

Discontinued Case Summary #2015-001: Real estate management company responds fairly and reasonably to surveillance camera concerns

Dec 2, 2015Discontinued Case Summary #2015-001
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a real estate management company failed to obtain consent for the collection of his personal information through video surveillance at a shopping mall. The complainant alleged inadequate signage and over-collection of his information when a camera was focused on him. The company responded by posting new signage and providing additional training to staff. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner discontinued the investigation, finding the company’s response to be fair and reasonable.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of signage for video surveillance
  • Over-collection of personal information
  • Consent to collection of personal information
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Nov 10, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015: Roofing company takes measures to ensure sub-contractors follow its privacy policy

A roofing company

An individual complained that an estimator, subcontracted by a roofing company, disclosed his personal information to another roofing company without consent. The investigation found that the second roofing company was responsible for its estimator's actions and that there was a disclosure of personal information in contravention of PIPEDA. The second roofing company implemented a recommendation to establish agreements with subcontractors regarding privacy policies and training.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015: Roofing company takes measures to ensure sub-contractors follow its privacy policy

Nov 10, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that an estimator, subcontracted by a roofing company, disclosed his personal information to another roofing company without consent. The investigation found that the second roofing company was responsible for its estimator's actions and that there was a disclosure of personal information in contravention of PIPEDA. The second roofing company implemented a recommendation to establish agreements with subcontractors regarding privacy policies and training.

Key Issues
  • Whether the subcontractor's actions were attributable to the organization.
  • Whether personal information was disclosed without consent.
  • Whether the disclosure exceeded the purposes for which the information was collected.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Oct 26, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-02· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-02: Retailer takes remedial actions after employee inappropriately texted customer

A retailer

An individual complained to the OPC after a retailer's delivery person texted her inappropriate comments after obtaining her number from a work phone and transferring it to a personal device. The complainant also felt the retailer mishandled her initial complaint. The OPC's involvement led the retailer to implement new procedures for faulty work phones, retrain employees on its privacy policy, and take disciplinary action against the delivery person. The complainant was satisfied with the resolution.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-02: Retailer takes remedial actions after employee inappropriately texted customer

Oct 26, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-02
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained to the OPC after a retailer's delivery person texted her inappropriate comments after obtaining her number from a work phone and transferring it to a personal device. The complainant also felt the retailer mishandled her initial complaint. The OPC's involvement led the retailer to implement new procedures for faulty work phones, retrain employees on its privacy policy, and take disciplinary action against the delivery person. The complainant was satisfied with the resolution.

Key Issues
  • Unauthorized use of customer personal information
  • Handling of customer complaints
  • Employee training on privacy policies
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Aug 14, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-07· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-07: Employee training a key factor in effectively satisfying customers’ requests about an organization’s personal information handling practices

A car dealership

An individual complained that a car dealership could not provide details about its personal information handling practices when asked. The dealership employee copied the complainant's driver's license and credit card without adequately explaining why or what safeguards were in place. The dealership agreed to hold an employee review session to ensure staff are knowledgeable about privacy policies and practices.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-07: Employee training a key factor in effectively satisfying customers’ requests about an organization’s personal information handling practices

Aug 14, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-07
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a car dealership could not provide details about its personal information handling practices when asked. The dealership employee copied the complainant's driver's license and credit card without adequately explaining why or what safeguards were in place. The dealership agreed to hold an employee review session to ensure staff are knowledgeable about privacy policies and practices.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of employee training on privacy policies
  • Transparency regarding collection and use of personal information
  • Responding to individual inquiries about personal information handling practices
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Aug 1, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-04· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-04: Misidentification and lack of access to personal information leads to mistaken four-year debt pursuit

A collection agency

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint from an individual who alleged that a collection agency was pursuing him for a debt he did not owe and that inaccurate information was appearing on his credit report. The individual was unable to obtain validation of the debt from the agency. Following the OPC's intervention, the agency investigated, found discrepancies on the original credit application, ceased collection efforts, and agreed to correct the individual's credit report. The individual was satisfied with this resolution.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-04: Misidentification and lack of access to personal information leads to mistaken four-year debt pursuit

Aug 1, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-04
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint from an individual who alleged that a collection agency was pursuing him for a debt he did not owe and that inaccurate information was appearing on his credit report. The individual was unable to obtain validation of the debt from the agency. Following the OPC's intervention, the agency investigated, found discrepancies on the original credit application, ceased collection efforts, and agreed to correct the individual's credit report. The individual was satisfied with this resolution.

Key Issues
  • Accuracy of personal information
  • Access to personal information
  • Debt collection practices
  • Correction of credit reports
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Jul 30, 2015· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Mishandling employees’ personal information – RCMP

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

The complainant alleged that the RCMP inappropriately used employees' personal information during a training course. The RCMP used real personal information from 91 employees for a data entry exercise without their consent and without advising participants of the data's sensitive nature. The RCMP acknowledged the contravention of section 7 of the Privacy Act and notified the affected employees.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

Mishandling employees’ personal information – RCMP

Jul 30, 2015
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the RCMP inappropriately used employees' personal information during a training course. The RCMP used real personal information from 91 employees for a data entry exercise without their consent and without advising participants of the data's sensitive nature. The RCMP acknowledged the contravention of section 7 of the Privacy Act and notified the affected employees.

Key Issues
  • Use of personal information for training purposes without consent
  • Adequacy of notification to affected individuals
  • Consistency of use with the original purpose of collection
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded
Jul 28, 2015Discontinued Case Summary #2015-002· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Discontinued Case Summary #2015-002: OPC discontinues additional complaints against Globe24h.com following investigation into same privacy issues

Globe24h.com

The OPC discontinued further complaints against Globe24h.com concerning the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information from Canadian court and tribunal decisions. While initial complaints were found to be well-founded, additional complaints were discontinued as the issues had already been investigated and reported on. The matter was further resolved when the Federal Court ordered Globe24h to remove personal information from its website and the website subsequently ceased operations.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded

Discontinued Case Summary #2015-002: OPC discontinues additional complaints against Globe24h.com following investigation into same privacy issues

Jul 28, 2015Discontinued Case Summary #2015-002
Plain-Language Summary

The OPC discontinued further complaints against Globe24h.com concerning the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information from Canadian court and tribunal decisions. While initial complaints were found to be well-founded, additional complaints were discontinued as the issues had already been investigated and reported on. The matter was further resolved when the Federal Court ordered Globe24h to remove personal information from its website and the website subsequently ceased operations.

Key Issues
  • Collection, use, and disclosure of personal information from public court decisions
  • Consent for republishing personal information
  • Discontinuance of investigation based on prior report
  • Circumvention of privacy laws by republishing sensitive data
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Jul 28, 2015· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Mishandling employees’ personal information – Parole Board of Canada

Parole Board of Canada

The complainant alleged that the Parole Board of Canada (PBC) contravened the Privacy Act by disclosing her medical information to external parties involved in a Public Service Staffing Tribunal (PSST) hearing. The PBC acknowledged that a human resources employee inadvertently emailed documents containing the complainant's medical information, which was outside the scope of the PSST's order. The PBC apologized to the complainant, ensured the recipients disposed of the information, and reported the breach internally.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

Mishandling employees’ personal information – Parole Board of Canada

Jul 28, 2015
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Parole Board of Canada (PBC) contravened the Privacy Act by disclosing her medical information to external parties involved in a Public Service Staffing Tribunal (PSST) hearing. The PBC acknowledged that a human resources employee inadvertently emailed documents containing the complainant's medical information, which was outside the scope of the PSST's order. The PBC apologized to the complainant, ensured the recipients disposed of the information, and reported the breach internally.

Key Issues
  • Was the complainant's medical information disclosed without consent or lawful authority?
  • Did the disclosure contravene the Privacy Act's provisions on disclosure of personal information?
  • Were the corrective actions taken by the PBC satisfactory?
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved
Jul 22, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-019· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA findings #2015-019: OPC complaint prompts telecom’s fraud investigation

A telecommunications company

A complaint was made against a telecommunications company and a credit-reporting agency after a fraudulent telecommunications account led to a false debt appearing on the complainant's credit report. The telecommunications company initially refused to correct the information or prove the complainant opened the account. Following OPC's involvement, the company's fraud team investigated, confirmed the account was fraudulent, cancelled it, and updated the credit-reporting agency with accurate information.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved

PIPEDA findings #2015-019: OPC complaint prompts telecom’s fraud investigation

Jul 22, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-019
Plain-Language Summary

A complaint was made against a telecommunications company and a credit-reporting agency after a fraudulent telecommunications account led to a false debt appearing on the complainant's credit report. The telecommunications company initially refused to correct the information or prove the complainant opened the account. Following OPC's involvement, the company's fraud team investigated, confirmed the account was fraudulent, cancelled it, and updated the credit-reporting agency with accurate information.

Key Issues
  • Accuracy and completeness of personal information
  • Correction of inaccurate personal information
  • Adequacy of customer authentication procedures
  • Accountability for information transferred to third parties
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Jul 9, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-01· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-01: Store stops practice of posting pictures of suspected shoplifters - July 2015

A department store

A customer complained that a department store was displaying photographs of individuals on a bulletin board to identify suspected shoplifters. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) advised the store that posting such photographs without consent contravened PIPEDA. The store agreed to remove the pictures and discontinue the practice, opting instead to work with the police.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-01: Store stops practice of posting pictures of suspected shoplifters - July 2015

Jul 9, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-01
Plain-Language Summary

A customer complained that a department store was displaying photographs of individuals on a bulletin board to identify suspected shoplifters. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) advised the store that posting such photographs without consent contravened PIPEDA. The store agreed to remove the pictures and discontinue the practice, opting instead to work with the police.

Key Issues
  • Public display of photographs of suspected shoplifters without consent
  • Application of PIPEDA to photographs taken from video surveillance
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Jul 6, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010: Customer’s emails sent to her acquaintance following a telecom employee’s attempt to fix a problem with the customer’s email service

A telecommunications provider

An individual complained that her telecommunications provider disclosed her personal information without consent when a technical support representative remotely accessed her computer to fix an email issue. The representative inadvertently set up an automatic email forwarding to an acquaintance's address, causing personal emails, including a temporary password, to be sent to the wrong recipient. While the provider implemented corrective measures, the OPC noted the provider initially misrepresented steps taken to address the issue.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010: Customer’s emails sent to her acquaintance following a telecom employee’s attempt to fix a problem with the customer’s email service

Jul 6, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that her telecommunications provider disclosed her personal information without consent when a technical support representative remotely accessed her computer to fix an email issue. The representative inadvertently set up an automatic email forwarding to an acquaintance's address, causing personal emails, including a temporary password, to be sent to the wrong recipient. While the provider implemented corrective measures, the OPC noted the provider initially misrepresented steps taken to address the issue.

Key Issues
  • Disclosure of personal information without consent
  • Accuracy of representations made to the OPC
  • Adequacy of internal procedures and training
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Jun 28, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-05· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-05: Anti-virus service provider steps up safeguards after customer personal information fraudulently used by someone posing as an employee

An anti-virus service provider

A couple complained after their personal information was fraudulently used by a marketing company posing as an employee of their anti-virus service provider. The couple suspected the service provider employee disclosed their account number to the marketing company. The OPC investigated and found the service provider had failed to adequately protect customer information. The service provider dismissed the employee responsible and implemented new safeguards, including an auditing system and a streamlined procedure for addressing privacy concerns.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-05: Anti-virus service provider steps up safeguards after customer personal information fraudulently used by someone posing as an employee

Jun 28, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-05
Plain-Language Summary

A couple complained after their personal information was fraudulently used by a marketing company posing as an employee of their anti-virus service provider. The couple suspected the service provider employee disclosed their account number to the marketing company. The OPC investigated and found the service provider had failed to adequately protect customer information. The service provider dismissed the employee responsible and implemented new safeguards, including an auditing system and a streamlined procedure for addressing privacy concerns.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of security safeguards
  • Unauthorized access to personal information
  • Complaint handling procedures
  • Accountability for employee actions
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
May 22, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-06· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-06: Manager snoops on employee’s personal bank account after employee calls in sick

A credit union

An individual complained that her manager at a credit union accessed her personal bank account without consent. The manager suspected the employee was not actually sick and used her customer data to check her debit card usage outside the province. The credit union acknowledged the improper access and agreed to apologize and address the manager's conduct. The employee was satisfied, and the matter was resolved.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-06: Manager snoops on employee’s personal bank account after employee calls in sick

May 22, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-06
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that her manager at a credit union accessed her personal bank account without consent. The manager suspected the employee was not actually sick and used her customer data to check her debit card usage outside the province. The credit union acknowledged the improper access and agreed to apologize and address the manager's conduct. The employee was satisfied, and the matter was resolved.

Key Issues
  • Manager accessing employee's personal banking information without valid business purpose
  • Use of personal information for a purpose other than that for which it was collected
  • Employee's right to privacy while also being a customer of the institution