
PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010: Customer’s emails sent to her acquaintance following a telecom employee’s attempt to fix a problem with the customer’s email service
An individual complained that her telecommunications provider disclosed her personal information without consent. A technical support representative, while attempting to fix her email service, inadvertently configured her email application to automatically forward her emails, including one containing a temporary password, to an acquaintance. The OPC found that this constituted a disclosure of personal information without consent, contravening Principle 4.3. The telecom provider initially provided inaccurate information to the OPC regarding corrective measures taken, but later clarified its existing measures. The complaint was found to be well-founded and resolved, as the provider had some measures in place to prevent recurrence, despite the initial misrepresentations.
- 1Whether the telecommunications provider disclosed the individual's personal information without consent
- 2Whether the disclosure contravened Principle 4.3 of PIPEDA
- 3Whether the telecommunications provider provided accurate information to the OPC during the investigation
- Disclosure without consent: Contravention of Principle 4.3 found
- Corrective measures: Existing measures deemed sufficient to resolve
- Complaint outcome: Well-founded and resolved
Complaint well-founded and resolved
The OPC found that the representative's actions led to an unauthorized disclosure of personal information. Although the provider initially misinformed the OPC about corrective actions, it demonstrated that some measures were in place to prevent recurrence, leading to a 'resolved' outcome.
The OPC encouraged the telecommunications provider to ensure its representations to the Office are accurate and complete in the future.
- Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro