
Mishandling employees’ personal information – RCMP
The complainant, an RCMP employee, alleged that the RCMP inappropriately used employees' personal information during a training course for Respectful Workplace Advisors on the National Administrative Records Management System (NARMS). During a data entry exercise, participants were given sheets containing real personal information of 91 employees, including names, ranks, and incident descriptions. The complainant raised concerns as participants were not advised real data would be used nor required to sign confidentiality agreements. The RCMP acknowledged that the use of this personal information for training purposes was not authorized under section 7 of the Privacy Act, as training was not a consistent use described in the applicable Personal Information Bank. The RCMP subsequently notified all 91 affected employees of the breach and took steps to prevent future occurrences. The OPC found the complaint to be well-founded.
- 1Whether the use of employees' personal information for training purposes constituted an unauthorized use under section 7(a) of the Privacy Act
- 2Whether training was a consistent use of personal information as described in the applicable Personal Information Bank (PIB PSU 915)
- Use of personal information: Unauthorized use for training
- Compliance with Privacy Act: Violation of section 7
- Complaint outcome: Complaint well-founded
Complaint well-founded
The RCMP itself determined that the use of the 91 employees’ personal information during the NARMS training sessions was not authorized under section 7 of the Privacy Act, as it was not for the purpose for which the information was obtained or compiled, nor a use consistent with that purpose.
The RCMP notified all 91 affected employees of the breach and implemented measures to ensure personal information would no longer be used for training purposes in this manner.
- s.3 Privacy Act
- s.7(a) Privacy Act
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro