BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Oct 16, 2002PIPEDA Case Summary #2002-82· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2002-82: Alleged disclosure of personal information without consent for secondary marketing purposes by a bank

A bank

An individual complained that a bank failed to obtain adequate consent for using and sharing customer data with affiliates for secondary marketing purposes, arguing the bank did not clearly inform customers or provide an easy opt-out mechanism. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated and found the bank's practices and materials, including informing customers of privacy policies and providing an opt-out process, constituted a reasonable effort to ensure customer knowledge and consent. The OPC concluded the bank was in compliance with PIPEDA principles regarding secondary marketing.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

PIPEDA Case Summary #2002-82: Alleged disclosure of personal information without consent for secondary marketing purposes by a bank

Oct 16, 2002PIPEDA Case Summary #2002-82
Adjudicator: George Radwanski
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a bank failed to obtain adequate consent for using and sharing customer data with affiliates for secondary marketing purposes, arguing the bank did not clearly inform customers or provide an easy opt-out mechanism. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated and found the bank's practices and materials, including informing customers of privacy policies and providing an opt-out process, constituted a reasonable effort to ensure customer knowledge and consent. The OPC concluded the bank was in compliance with PIPEDA principles regarding secondary marketing.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of consent for secondary marketing purposes
  • Clarity of information provided to customers about data use and sharing
  • Availability and ease of the opt-out process
  • Bank's compliance with PIPEDA principles on knowledge and consent
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Feb 25, 2002· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Privacy Commissioner's finding on Canada Post's National Change of Address service - February 25, 2002

Canada Post

The Privacy Commissioner investigated a complaint regarding Canada Post's National Change of Address (NCOA) service. The complainant argued that Canada Post failed to adequately inform subscribers that their new addresses would be disclosed to third-party "mailers" (including mass marketers and direct marketers) for commercial purposes. The Commissioner found that Canada Post contravened sections 5(2) and 8 of the Privacy Act by not clearly identifying this purpose of disclosure and by failing to obtain the necessary consent from individuals.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

Privacy Commissioner's finding on Canada Post's National Change of Address service - February 25, 2002

Feb 25, 2002
Adjudicator: George Radwanski
Plain-Language Summary

The Privacy Commissioner investigated a complaint regarding Canada Post's National Change of Address (NCOA) service. The complainant argued that Canada Post failed to adequately inform subscribers that their new addresses would be disclosed to third-party "mailers" (including mass marketers and direct marketers) for commercial purposes. The Commissioner found that Canada Post contravened sections 5(2) and 8 of the Privacy Act by not clearly identifying this purpose of disclosure and by failing to obtain the necessary consent from individuals.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of information provided to NCOA service subscribers regarding disclosure of new addresses to third parties.
  • Whether consent obtained for NCOA service implicitly includes consent for disclosure to mass marketers and direct marketers.
  • Canada Post's use of "negative consent" (opt-out) versus "positive consent" (opt-in) for disclosure of personal information.