← Back to catalogue/Federal (Canada)Early resolved case summary #2015-01
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-01: Store stops practice of posting pictures of suspected shoplifters - July 2015

Organization: A department storeComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

A customer complained to the OPC after noticing a department store publicly displaying photographs of individuals, asking for information about them. The store claimed police and legal counsel advised this practice was permissible for alleged shoplifters. The OPC disagreed, explaining that publicly disclosing personal information (photographs) without consent is not allowed under PIPEDA. The store agreed to remove the pictures and discontinue the practice, opting to deal with police directly for such matters. The complainant was satisfied with this resolution.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether publicly displaying photographs of suspected shoplifters without consent constitutes an unauthorized disclosure of personal information under PIPEDA
  2. 2Whether photographs of individuals recorded on video surveillance are considered personal information under PIPEDA
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Public display of photos: Practice found non-compliant with PIPEDA
  • Resolution of complaint: Store agreed to cease practice
  • Complainant satisfaction: Complainant satisfied with resolution
Outcome

Complaint early resolved — store discontinued practice

Reasoning

The OPC determined that publicly displaying photographs of individuals without their consent constituted an unauthorized disclosure of personal information under PIPEDA. The store agreed to cease the practice upon being informed of this interpretation.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The store agreed to remove the pictures from the bulletin board and discontinue its practice of publicly displaying photographs of suspected shoplifters. It also agreed to deal with the police on such matters in the future.

Statutes considered
  • Principle 4.3 PIPEDA

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro