BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

9 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Dec 18, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-021· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA findings #2015-021: Telecom company responsible for erroneous debt collection calls

A telecommunications company

A telecommunications company erroneously continued to report a debt to a credit-reporting agency after the complainant was discharged from bankruptcy. This impacted the complainant's credit score and led to unwanted debt collection calls. The company investigated, corrected its records, notified the credit-reporting agency, and ensured the debt collection calls would cease.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

PIPEDA findings #2015-021: Telecom company responsible for erroneous debt collection calls

Dec 18, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-021
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A telecommunications company erroneously continued to report a debt to a credit-reporting agency after the complainant was discharged from bankruptcy. This impacted the complainant's credit score and led to unwanted debt collection calls. The company investigated, corrected its records, notified the credit-reporting agency, and ensured the debt collection calls would cease.

Key Issues
  • Accuracy and up-to-dateness of personal information
  • Disclosure of personal information to third parties
  • Appropriate use of personal information in decision-making
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Oct 26, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-02· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-02: Retailer takes remedial actions after employee inappropriately texted customer

A retailer

An individual complained to the OPC after a retailer's delivery person texted her inappropriate comments after obtaining her number from a work phone and transferring it to a personal device. The complainant also felt the retailer mishandled her initial complaint. The OPC's involvement led the retailer to implement new procedures for faulty work phones, retrain employees on its privacy policy, and take disciplinary action against the delivery person. The complainant was satisfied with the resolution.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-02: Retailer takes remedial actions after employee inappropriately texted customer

Oct 26, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-02
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained to the OPC after a retailer's delivery person texted her inappropriate comments after obtaining her number from a work phone and transferring it to a personal device. The complainant also felt the retailer mishandled her initial complaint. The OPC's involvement led the retailer to implement new procedures for faulty work phones, retrain employees on its privacy policy, and take disciplinary action against the delivery person. The complainant was satisfied with the resolution.

Key Issues
  • Unauthorized use of customer personal information
  • Handling of customer complaints
  • Employee training on privacy policies
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Aug 14, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-07· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-07: Employee training a key factor in effectively satisfying customers’ requests about an organization’s personal information handling practices

A car dealership

An individual complained that a car dealership could not provide details about its personal information handling practices when asked. The dealership employee copied the complainant's driver's license and credit card without adequately explaining why or what safeguards were in place. The dealership agreed to hold an employee review session to ensure staff are knowledgeable about privacy policies and practices.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-07: Employee training a key factor in effectively satisfying customers’ requests about an organization’s personal information handling practices

Aug 14, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-07
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a car dealership could not provide details about its personal information handling practices when asked. The dealership employee copied the complainant's driver's license and credit card without adequately explaining why or what safeguards were in place. The dealership agreed to hold an employee review session to ensure staff are knowledgeable about privacy policies and practices.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of employee training on privacy policies
  • Transparency regarding collection and use of personal information
  • Responding to individual inquiries about personal information handling practices
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Aug 1, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-04· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-04: Misidentification and lack of access to personal information leads to mistaken four-year debt pursuit

A collection agency

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint from an individual who alleged that a collection agency was pursuing him for a debt he did not owe and that inaccurate information was appearing on his credit report. The individual was unable to obtain validation of the debt from the agency. Following the OPC's intervention, the agency investigated, found discrepancies on the original credit application, ceased collection efforts, and agreed to correct the individual's credit report. The individual was satisfied with this resolution.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-04: Misidentification and lack of access to personal information leads to mistaken four-year debt pursuit

Aug 1, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-04
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint from an individual who alleged that a collection agency was pursuing him for a debt he did not owe and that inaccurate information was appearing on his credit report. The individual was unable to obtain validation of the debt from the agency. Following the OPC's intervention, the agency investigated, found discrepancies on the original credit application, ceased collection efforts, and agreed to correct the individual's credit report. The individual was satisfied with this resolution.

Key Issues
  • Accuracy of personal information
  • Access to personal information
  • Debt collection practices
  • Correction of credit reports
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Jul 9, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-01· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-01: Store stops practice of posting pictures of suspected shoplifters - July 2015

A department store

A customer complained that a department store was displaying photographs of individuals on a bulletin board to identify suspected shoplifters. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) advised the store that posting such photographs without consent contravened PIPEDA. The store agreed to remove the pictures and discontinue the practice, opting instead to work with the police.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-01: Store stops practice of posting pictures of suspected shoplifters - July 2015

Jul 9, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-01
Plain-Language Summary

A customer complained that a department store was displaying photographs of individuals on a bulletin board to identify suspected shoplifters. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) advised the store that posting such photographs without consent contravened PIPEDA. The store agreed to remove the pictures and discontinue the practice, opting instead to work with the police.

Key Issues
  • Public display of photographs of suspected shoplifters without consent
  • Application of PIPEDA to photographs taken from video surveillance
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Jun 28, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-05· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-05: Anti-virus service provider steps up safeguards after customer personal information fraudulently used by someone posing as an employee

An anti-virus service provider

A couple complained after their personal information was fraudulently used by a marketing company posing as an employee of their anti-virus service provider. The couple suspected the service provider employee disclosed their account number to the marketing company. The OPC investigated and found the service provider had failed to adequately protect customer information. The service provider dismissed the employee responsible and implemented new safeguards, including an auditing system and a streamlined procedure for addressing privacy concerns.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-05: Anti-virus service provider steps up safeguards after customer personal information fraudulently used by someone posing as an employee

Jun 28, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-05
Plain-Language Summary

A couple complained after their personal information was fraudulently used by a marketing company posing as an employee of their anti-virus service provider. The couple suspected the service provider employee disclosed their account number to the marketing company. The OPC investigated and found the service provider had failed to adequately protect customer information. The service provider dismissed the employee responsible and implemented new safeguards, including an auditing system and a streamlined procedure for addressing privacy concerns.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of security safeguards
  • Unauthorized access to personal information
  • Complaint handling procedures
  • Accountability for employee actions
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
May 22, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-06· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-06: Manager snoops on employee’s personal bank account after employee calls in sick

A credit union

An individual complained that her manager at a credit union accessed her personal bank account without consent. The manager suspected the employee was not actually sick and used her customer data to check her debit card usage outside the province. The credit union acknowledged the improper access and agreed to apologize and address the manager's conduct. The employee was satisfied, and the matter was resolved.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-06: Manager snoops on employee’s personal bank account after employee calls in sick

May 22, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-06
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that her manager at a credit union accessed her personal bank account without consent. The manager suspected the employee was not actually sick and used her customer data to check her debit card usage outside the province. The credit union acknowledged the improper access and agreed to apologize and address the manager's conduct. The employee was satisfied, and the matter was resolved.

Key Issues
  • Manager accessing employee's personal banking information without valid business purpose
  • Use of personal information for a purpose other than that for which it was collected
  • Employee's right to privacy while also being a customer of the institution
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Mar 12, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-020· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA findings #2015-020: Hotel chain alerts its clients about “special offer” telephone scam

A hotel chain

A complainant was concerned that a hotel chain linked her IP address to her phone number after she received a promotional phone call. The hotel chain clarified that it does not engage in promotional calls and that the call was a fraudulent telemarketing scam by an unrelated party. The complainant suggested the hotel warn its customers about such scams, which the hotel did, leading to the matter being resolved.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

PIPEDA findings #2015-020: Hotel chain alerts its clients about “special offer” telephone scam

Mar 12, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-020
Plain-Language Summary

A complainant was concerned that a hotel chain linked her IP address to her phone number after she received a promotional phone call. The hotel chain clarified that it does not engage in promotional calls and that the call was a fraudulent telemarketing scam by an unrelated party. The complainant suggested the hotel warn its customers about such scams, which the hotel did, leading to the matter being resolved.

Key Issues
  • Unauthorized collection of personal information
  • Misrepresentation by a third party
  • Complainant's concern about IP address linkage to phone number
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Jan 21, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-03· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2015-03: Office building tenant reconsiders placement of video surveillance cameras

An office building management company

A tenant complained about five video surveillance cameras installed in common areas of their office building by another tenant. The complainant was particularly concerned about two cameras that monitored activity near his office door and the elevators, viewing it as an invasion of privacy. Following the OPC's involvement, the cameras of most concern were relocated inside the other tenant's offices, resolving the complainant's privacy concerns.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2015-03: Office building tenant reconsiders placement of video surveillance cameras

Jan 21, 2015Early resolved case summary #2015-03
Plain-Language Summary

A tenant complained about five video surveillance cameras installed in common areas of their office building by another tenant. The complainant was particularly concerned about two cameras that monitored activity near his office door and the elevators, viewing it as an invasion of privacy. Following the OPC's involvement, the cameras of most concern were relocated inside the other tenant's offices, resolving the complainant's privacy concerns.

Key Issues
  • Appropriateness of video surveillance in common areas
  • Collection of personal information in shared spaces
  • Minimum collection principle for video surveillance