BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

49 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Feb 2, 20215820-01453· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Correctional Service of Canada, 5820-01453

The OIC ordered Correctional Service of Canada to provide a final response to the access request submitted on December 3, 2018..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Correctional Service of Canada, 5820-01453

Feb 2, 20215820-01453

The OIC ordered Correctional Service of Canada to provide a final response to the access request submitted on December 3, 2018..

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded
Feb 2, 2021PIPEDA Findings #2021-001· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2021-001: Joint investigation of Clearview AI, Inc. by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, and the Information Privacy Commissioner of Alberta

Clearview AI, Inc.

A joint investigation by Canadian privacy authorities found that Clearview AI, Inc. contravened PIPEDA and provincial privacy laws by collecting, using, and disclosing personal information without consent and for inappropriate purposes. Clearview's facial recognition tool scraped billions of images from the internet to create biometric facial arrays, which were then provided to law enforcement and other clients. The authorities concluded that Clearview's mass collection and use of sensitive biometric data was not for an appropriate purpose, nor was it obtained with the requisite consent.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded

PIPEDA Findings #2021-001: Joint investigation of Clearview AI, Inc. by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, and the Information Privacy Commissioner of Alberta

Feb 2, 2021PIPEDA Findings #2021-001
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A joint investigation by Canadian privacy authorities found that Clearview AI, Inc. contravened PIPEDA and provincial privacy laws by collecting, using, and disclosing personal information without consent and for inappropriate purposes. Clearview's facial recognition tool scraped billions of images from the internet to create biometric facial arrays, which were then provided to law enforcement and other clients. The authorities concluded that Clearview's mass collection and use of sensitive biometric data was not for an appropriate purpose, nor was it obtained with the requisite consent.

Key Issues
  • Whether Clearview obtained requisite consent for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information.
  • Whether Clearview collected, used, and disclosed personal information for an appropriate purpose.
  • Whether Clearview satisfied its biometric obligations in Quebec.
  • Whether Canadian privacy authorities had jurisdiction over Clearview's activities.
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActNot well-founded
Jan 21, 20212021 OIC 2· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Health Canada (Re), 2021 OIC 2

Health Canada

The complainant alleged that Health Canada did not conduct a reasonable search for records concerning producers and users of medical cannabis. Responsive records were drawn from one database, but Health Canada argued retrieving additional records from a second database would be unreasonable due to the manual labour involved. The Information Commissioner agreed that the search was reasonable given the effort required.

Quick View

Access to Information ActNot well-founded

Health Canada (Re), 2021 OIC 2

Jan 21, 20212021 OIC 2
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Health Canada did not conduct a reasonable search for records concerning producers and users of medical cannabis. Responsive records were drawn from one database, but Health Canada argued retrieving additional records from a second database would be unreasonable due to the manual labour involved. The Information Commissioner agreed that the search was reasonable given the effort required.

Key Issues
  • Reasonableness of search
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActNot well-founded
Jan 7, 20212021 OIC 1· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Transport Canada (Re), 2021 OIC 1

Transport Canada

The complainant alleged that Transport Canada improperly relied on section 26 of the Access to Information Act to refuse access to annual statistics regarding the processing of access to information and privacy requests. The Office of the Information Commissioner found that Transport Canada met the criteria for applying section 26 and had properly considered all relevant factors in its decision.

Quick View

Access to Information ActNot well-founded

Transport Canada (Re), 2021 OIC 1

Jan 7, 20212021 OIC 1
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Transport Canada improperly relied on section 26 of the Access to Information Act to refuse access to annual statistics regarding the processing of access to information and privacy requests. The Office of the Information Commissioner found that Transport Canada met the criteria for applying section 26 and had properly considered all relevant factors in its decision.

Key Issues
  • Applicability of section 26 of the ATIA (Refusal of access if information to be published)
  • Proper exercise of discretion by the institution