BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

17 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved
Apr 25, 2013Early resolved case summary #2013-01· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2013-01: Property management company alters its rental application form to make clear that Social Insurance Number is optional

A property management company

An individual complained that a property management company was over-collecting personal information, including Social Insurance Number (SIN), driver's licence information, and banking information, on its rental application forms. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) also investigated the company's lack of a privacy policy. The company committed to making it clear that the request for SIN, driver's licence, and banking information was optional and to posting a privacy policy on its website. The complainant was satisfied with these changes.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved

Early resolved case summary #2013-01: Property management company alters its rental application form to make clear that Social Insurance Number is optional

Apr 25, 2013Early resolved case summary #2013-01
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a property management company was over-collecting personal information, including Social Insurance Number (SIN), driver's licence information, and banking information, on its rental application forms. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) also investigated the company's lack of a privacy policy. The company committed to making it clear that the request for SIN, driver's licence, and banking information was optional and to posting a privacy policy on its website. The complainant was satisfied with these changes.

Key Issues
  • Collection of SIN, driver's licence, and banking information on rental applications
  • Requirement for a privacy policy on the company website
  • Responsibility for third-party practices
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Apr 15, 2013Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2013-002· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2013-002: Bank misinformed client of purpose of requesting personal information for picking up credit card

A bank

A bank customer complained that the bank improperly demanded to record information from his driver's license when picking up a replacement credit card. The bank initially claimed this was for anti-money laundering purposes, but later admitted this explanation was incorrect. The Office found the demand for information was not well-founded as no information was actually collected. However, the bank contravened PIPEDA by misinforming the customer about the purpose of the collection, a contravention that was resolved by revised bank procedures and staff training.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2013-002: Bank misinformed client of purpose of requesting personal information for picking up credit card

Apr 15, 2013Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2013-002
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

A bank customer complained that the bank improperly demanded to record information from his driver's license when picking up a replacement credit card. The bank initially claimed this was for anti-money laundering purposes, but later admitted this explanation was incorrect. The Office found the demand for information was not well-founded as no information was actually collected. However, the bank contravened PIPEDA by misinforming the customer about the purpose of the collection, a contravention that was resolved by revised bank procedures and staff training.

Key Issues
  • Whether the bank limited the collection of personal information to what was necessary.
  • Whether the bank's employees could explain the purposes for collecting personal information.