Updated daily · 21,367 recordsSign in
The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,563 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 7, 20255824-04537

National Defence, 5824-04537

The OIC ordered National Defence to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days after the date of the final report.

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

National Defence, 5824-04537

Jul 7, 20255824-04537

The OIC ordered National Defence to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days after the date of the final report.

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

National Defence, 5824-04529

Jul 7, 20255824-04529

OIC order issued to National Defence.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 7, 20255824-03298

5824-03298 — Privy Council Office

Privy Council Office

The complainant alleged that the Privy Council Office (PCO) failed to respond to an access request for historical assessments on Russia and former Soviet Union countries within the extended deadline. The Information Commissioner found that PCO's delay was unacceptable, particularly their lengthy consultation process and the excessive time allocated for internal review. The Commissioner ordered PCO to provide a response within 60 business days and recommended a review of their internal processes.

Quick view

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5824-03298 — Privy Council Office

Jul 7, 20255824-03298
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Privy Council Office (PCO) failed to respond to an access request for historical assessments on Russia and former Soviet Union countries within the extended deadline. The Information Commissioner found that PCO's delay was unacceptable, particularly their lengthy consultation process and the excessive time allocated for internal review. The Commissioner ordered PCO to provide a response within 60 business days and recommended a review of their internal processes.

Key Issues
  • Failure to respond within the statutory time limits
  • Unjustified extension of time for processing access requests
  • Inefficiency in internal consultation and approval processes
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 7, 20255824-04515

National Defence, 5824-04515

The OIC ordered National Defence to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days after the date of the final report..

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

National Defence, 5824-04515

Jul 7, 20255824-04515

The OIC ordered National Defence to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days after the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 7, 20255824-04516

National Defence, 5824-04516

The OIC ordered National Defence to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days after the date of the final report..

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

National Defence, 5824-04516

Jul 7, 20255824-04516

The OIC ordered National Defence to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days after the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 7, 20255824-01710

Privy Council Office, 5824-01710

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Privy Council Office, 5824-01710

Jul 7, 20255824-01710

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 7, 20255824-02798

Transport Canada, 5824-02798

The OIC ordered Transport Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following the date of the final report..

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Transport Canada, 5824-02798

Jul 7, 20255824-02798

The OIC ordered Transport Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following the date of the final report..

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, 5824-03594

Jul 7, 20255824-03594

The OIC ordered Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 7, 20255822-03263

5822-03263 — Trans Mountain Corporation

Trans Mountain Corporation

The complainant alleged that Trans Mountain Corporation (TMC) improperly withheld records related to the initial application and approval of the Trans Mountain Pipeline in the early 1950s. TMC failed to identify specific withheld information or demonstrate how it met exemption criteria under the Access to Information Act. TMC also failed to justify refusing to provide a copy of the records. The Information Commissioner found the complaint well-founded and ordered TMC to disclose the records.

Quick view

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5822-03263 — Trans Mountain Corporation

Jul 7, 20255822-03263
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Trans Mountain Corporation (TMC) improperly withheld records related to the initial application and approval of the Trans Mountain Pipeline in the early 1950s. TMC failed to identify specific withheld information or demonstrate how it met exemption criteria under the Access to Information Act. TMC also failed to justify refusing to provide a copy of the records. The Information Commissioner found the complaint well-founded and ordered TMC to disclose the records.

Key Issues
  • TMC's failure to identify specific withheld information.
  • TMC's failure to establish that exemptions applied to the withheld information.
  • TMC's failure to justify refusing to provide a copy of the records.
  • The age of the records and lack of demonstrable safety threat.
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2025 QCCAI 195 — Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2025 QCCAI 202 — Quebec City

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2025 QCCAI 203 — Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2025 QCCAI 213 — Régie incendie de l'Alliance des Grandes-Seigneuries

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

25-07 — Department of Justice

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4675

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction