The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

183 decisions matching
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2005-026 — Alberta Human Resources and Employment

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaHealth Information Act
Alberta flag

H2005-004 — Calgary Health Region

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled
Federal (Canada) flag
Dec 16, 2005Settled Case summary #17Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Settled case summary #17 — A not-for-profit association

A not-for-profit association

A member of a not-for-profit association complained that the association required a second piece of identification, in addition to his membership card, to obtain member discounts. The complainant believed his membership card should be sufficient and that collecting further personal information was unwarranted. The association explained that it had legal agreements with vendors requiring it to sell discounted products only to current members. Due to some members loaning their cards to non-members, which caused legal and revenue issues, the association implemented the supplementary identification requirement to confirm identity and prevent misuse. The association also noted that members could choose their secondary identification and that this information was not recorded. The complainant was satisfied with this explanation, and the complaint was settled.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled case summary #17 — A not-for-profit association

Dec 16, 2005Settled Case summary #17
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

A member of a not-for-profit association complained that the association required a second piece of identification, in addition to his membership card, to obtain member discounts. The complainant believed his membership card should be sufficient and that collecting further personal information was unwarranted. The association explained that it had legal agreements with vendors requiring it to sell discounted products only to current members. Due to some members loaning their cards to non-members, which caused legal and revenue issues, the association implemented the supplementary identification requirement to confirm identity and prevent misuse. The association also noted that members could choose their secondary identification and that this information was not recorded. The complainant was satisfied with this explanation, and the complaint was settled.

Key Issues
  • Whether requiring supplementary identification for member discounts was an unwarranted collection of personal information
  • Whether the membership card alone was sufficient identification
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2004-016 — Northern Lakes College

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F05-37 — BC OIPC order 854

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F05-36 — BC OIPC order 851

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaHealth Information Act
Alberta flag

H2005-IR-002 — Alberta Cervical Cancer Screening Program (ACCSP) and Alberta Health and Wellness and Calgary Health Region and Calgary Laboratory Services

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2005-015 — Alberta Automobile Insurance Board

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

FI-05-70 — Workers' Compensation Board

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

FI-05-56 — Office of Economic Development

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

FI-05-54 — Acadia University

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaPersonal Information Protection Act
Alberta flag

P0197 — Manulife

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2004-022 — Calgary Police Service

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled
Federal (Canada) flag
Nov 21, 2005Settled Case summary #16Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Settled Case summary #16: Personal information on receipts removed, information collected when goods returned is limited (November 21, 2005)

A retail chain

An individual complained about a retail chain's practice of printing personal information on receipts and collecting excessive information for returns. The complainant was concerned that the printing of name, credit card number, and expiry date on receipts, and the recording of driver's license and credit card information for refunds, constituted unnecessary collection of personal information. During the investigation, the company updated its point-of-sale equipment to mask personal information on receipts. For returns, the company committed to continuing to collect name, address, and telephone number, but would no longer record identification information, only asking to see it. Credit card information would only be requested if a credit card was used for the original purchase. The company also committed to training its employees on these new procedures. Both the complainant and the OPC were satisfied with these changes.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled Case summary #16: Personal information on receipts removed, information collected when goods returned is limited (November 21, 2005)

Nov 21, 2005Settled Case summary #16
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained about a retail chain's practice of printing personal information on receipts and collecting excessive information for returns. The complainant was concerned that the printing of name, credit card number, and expiry date on receipts, and the recording of driver's license and credit card information for refunds, constituted unnecessary collection of personal information. During the investigation, the company updated its point-of-sale equipment to mask personal information on receipts. For returns, the company committed to continuing to collect name, address, and telephone number, but would no longer record identification information, only asking to see it. Credit card information would only be requested if a credit card was used for the original purchase. The company also committed to training its employees on these new procedures. Both the complainant and the OPC were satisfied with these changes.

Key Issues
  • Whether printing customer's name, credit card number, and expiry date on receipts constituted unnecessary collection of personal information under PIPEDA
  • Whether requiring and recording a driver's license and credit card for returns constituted unnecessary collection of personal information under PIPEDA
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

FI-05-51 — Tourism, Culture & Heritage

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction