Condita Research

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,003 decisions matching
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 177 — McGill University

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 178 — Université de McGill

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 181 — Université de McGill

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 183 — Université de McGill

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 185 — Université de McGill

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 187 — Université de McGill

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Aug 6, 2020· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PA-055322 (PCO) et PA-055323 (DOJ) — Privy Council Office (PCO) and Department of Justice (DOJ)

Privy Council Office (PCO) and Department of Justice (DOJ)

This investigation examined a complaint regarding the alleged leak of personal information about a Supreme Court of Canada candidate. The complainant alleged that documents revealed by an anonymous source demonstrated a disagreement between the Prime Minister’s Office and the former Attorney General concerning the candidate's nomination. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated the Privy Council Office (PCO) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) but found no evidence that these institutions were responsible for the unauthorized disclosure. The OPC's investigation was constrained by jurisdictional limitations, as the Privacy Act does not apply to Ministers' offices or the Prime Minister's Office.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

PA-055322 (PCO) et PA-055323 (DOJ) — Privy Council Office (PCO) and Department of Justice (DOJ)

Aug 6, 2020
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation examined a complaint regarding the alleged leak of personal information about a Supreme Court of Canada candidate. The complainant alleged that documents revealed by an anonymous source demonstrated a disagreement between the Prime Minister’s Office and the former Attorney General concerning the candidate's nomination. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated the Privy Council Office (PCO) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) but found no evidence that these institutions were responsible for the unauthorized disclosure. The OPC's investigation was constrained by jurisdictional limitations, as the Privacy Act does not apply to Ministers' offices or the Prime Minister's Office.

Key Issues
  • Whether the PCO or DOJ contravened section 8 of the Privacy Act by improperly disclosing personal information.
  • Whether the PCO or DOJ had access to the personal information that was leaked to the media.
  • The jurisdictional limitations of the Privacy Act concerning Ministers' offices and the Prime Minister's Office.
  • The need for legislative reform to extend the Privacy Act's coverage.
Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F20-34 — BC OIPC order 2311

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F20-35 — BC OIPC order 2312

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 182 — Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 189 — Quebec City Police Service and Sûreté du Québec

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4057

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3940

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Aug 4, 2020PIPEDA Findings #2020-001· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2020-001: Bank ensures openness and comparable protection for personal information transferred to third party

TD Canada Trust

A former employee of TD Canada Trust (TD) complained that TD had outsourced fraud claims processing to a third-party provider in India without customer consent or an opt-out option. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated and found that TD was not required to obtain additional consent as the personal information was used for the original purpose of fraud claims management. The OPC also found TD was sufficiently open about its outsourcing practices and remained accountable by ensuring comparable protection through contractual and monitoring measures.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

PIPEDA Findings #2020-001: Bank ensures openness and comparable protection for personal information transferred to third party

Aug 4, 2020PIPEDA Findings #2020-001
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A former employee of TD Canada Trust (TD) complained that TD had outsourced fraud claims processing to a third-party provider in India without customer consent or an opt-out option. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated and found that TD was not required to obtain additional consent as the personal information was used for the original purpose of fraud claims management. The OPC also found TD was sufficiently open about its outsourcing practices and remained accountable by ensuring comparable protection through contractual and monitoring measures.

Key Issues
  • Requirement for consent to transfer personal information to a third-party processor for the same purpose
  • Sufficiency of openness regarding outsourcing of personal information to foreign jurisdictions
  • Accountability for personal information transferred to a third-party processor and ensuring comparable protection
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 196 — Ministère de la Sécurité publique

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.