Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Department of Justice Canada (Re), 2020 OIC 6

Organization: Department of Justice CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that the Department of Justice Canada (Justice) failed to respond to an access request within the statutory time limits. The OIC had previously investigated a complaint regarding the same request and recommended a response by December 15, 2019. Justice did not accept this recommendation but committed to disclosing the records by April 27, 2020. When Justice failed to meet this extended deadline, a new complaint was filed. The Commissioner found that Justice was deemed to have refused access under subsection 10(3) of the Act due to its failure to provide records within the prescribed timeframes. Consequently, the complaint was found to be well founded, and Justice was ordered to respond to the access request by September 30, 2020.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the institution failed to respond to an access request within the time limits set out in the Act
  2. 2Whether the institution was deemed to have refused access pursuant to subsection 10(3) of the Act
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Timeliness / deemed refusal: Deemed refusal found
  • Complaint status: Complaint well founded
  • Disclosure order: Records ordered disclosed by deadline
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered

Reasoning

The Department of Justice Canada failed to respond to the access request within the statutory time limits, and subsequently failed to meet its own committed disclosure date, leading to a deemed refusal of access under subsection 10(3) of the Act.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Information Commissioner ordered the Department of Justice Canada to respond to the access request by September 30, 2020.

Statutes considered
  • s.10(3) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro