Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PA-048557, PA-048561 — Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA)

Organization: Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA)Complainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

An individual complained that the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA) contravened the Privacy Act by collecting and disclosing his personal information to police after finding legal medical cannabis during a security screening. The complainant argued that CATSA's mandate is aviation security, not general law enforcement, and that cannabis is not a prohibited item. CATSA maintained that its actions were incidental to its mandate and in the public interest, consistent with its regulator's direction. The OPC found that CATSA lacked the legal authority under section 4 of the Privacy Act to collect personal information for general law enforcement purposes related to cannabis, as cannabis is not on the Prohibited Items List and does not pose an aviation security threat. Similarly, the OPC concluded that the disclosure of this personal information to police was not consistent with section 8 of the Privacy Act. However, the OPC found CATSA's practice of destroying records related to such searches to be consistent with section 6 of the Act. The OPC recommended that CATSA cease unauthorized collection and disclosure of personal information related to cannabis and destroy any existing records, which CATSA agreed to implement.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the collection of personal information from travellers found to be in possession of cannabis is consistent with section 4 of the Privacy Act
  2. 2Whether the disclosure of the personal information of travellers found to be in possession of cannabis is consistent with section 8 of the Privacy Act
  3. 3Whether CATSA’s record retention practices in terms of the personal information collected from travellers found to be in possession of cannabis are consistent with section 6 of the Privacy Act
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Collection of personal information: Collection found to be unauthorized
  • Disclosure of personal information: Disclosure found to be unauthorized
  • Record destruction: Practice found to be consistent with Act
  • Recommendations: Recommendations made and accepted
Outcome

Complaint well-founded and conditionally resolved in part, not well-founded in part

Reasoning

The OPC found that CATSA's collection and disclosure of personal information regarding cannabis possession were outside its mandate of aviation security and not authorized by the Privacy Act. However, CATSA's practice of destroying records was consistent with the Act, and CATSA committed to implementing the OPC's recommendations to rectify the contraventions.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

CATSA was recommended to cease collecting and disclosing personal information of travellers found with cannabis (unless clearly illegal without further fact-finding) and update its policies, and to review and destroy any existing records containing such personal information.

Statutes considered
  • s.4 Privacy Act
  • s.8 Privacy Act
  • s.6 Privacy Act
  • s.8(2)(a) Privacy Act
  • s.8(2)(b) Privacy Act
  • s.6(1) CATSA Act
  • s.10(1) Canadian Aviation Security Regulations
  • s.4 Privacy Regulations

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro