BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

363 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 26, 20255825-00457· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Privy Council Office, 5825-00457

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Privy Council Office, 5825-00457

Nov 26, 20255825-00457

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 26, 20255825-00394· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Privy Council Office, 5825-00394

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Privy Council Office, 5825-00394

Nov 26, 20255825-00394

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Nov 25, 2025PIPEDA Findings #2025-005· Indexed Jun 5, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2025-005: Investigation into a swimming pool’s compliance with consent requirements under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act

A privately owned swimming pool

This investigation concerned a privately owned swimming pool's policy requiring parents to consent to the use of photos and videos of their children for promotional purposes as a condition of enrolling them in swimming lessons. The OPC found that this requirement contravened PIPEDA principles regarding consent for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information. The swimming pool has agreed to implement an opt-in photo policy, resolving the complaint.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2025-005: Investigation into a swimming pool’s compliance with consent requirements under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act

Nov 25, 2025PIPEDA Findings #2025-005
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation concerned a privately owned swimming pool's policy requiring parents to consent to the use of photos and videos of their children for promotional purposes as a condition of enrolling them in swimming lessons. The OPC found that this requirement contravened PIPEDA principles regarding consent for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information. The swimming pool has agreed to implement an opt-in photo policy, resolving the complaint.

Key Issues
  • Whether requiring consent for promotional photos/videos as a condition of service violates PIPEDA.
  • Whether photos/videos of children in swim attire are sensitive personal information.
  • Whether the swimming pool's stated business needs justified the mandatory consent policy.
  • Whether consent was sought appropriately for staff training purposes.
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 25, 20255825-01396· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Library and Archives Canada, 5825-01396

The OIC ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a final response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Library and Archives Canada, 5825-01396

Nov 25, 20255825-01396

The OIC ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a final response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 25, 20255825-01398· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Library and Archives Canada, 5825-01398

The OIC ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a final response to the access request no later than 90 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Library and Archives Canada, 5825-01398

Nov 25, 20255825-01398

The OIC ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a final response to the access request no later than 90 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 25, 20255825-01184· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Privy Council Office, 5825-01184

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than January 30, 2026..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Privy Council Office, 5825-01184

Nov 25, 20255825-01184

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than January 30, 2026..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 25, 20255825-01338· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Privy Council Office, 5825-01338

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than January 17, 2025..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Privy Council Office, 5825-01338

Nov 25, 20255825-01338

The OIC ordered Privy Council Office to provide a complete response to the access request no later than January 17, 2025..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Nov 25, 20255822-05050· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (Re), 2025 OIC 57

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records concerning annual expenses incurred to provide security for internationally protected persons visiting Canada. The RCMP provided a two-page summary instead of retrieving the requested records, arguing that most would be exempt. The Information Commissioner found the search unreasonable, ordering the RCMP to conduct a new search and respond to the request.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (Re), 2025 OIC 57

Nov 25, 20255822-05050
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records concerning annual expenses incurred to provide security for internationally protected persons visiting Canada. The RCMP provided a two-page summary instead of retrieving the requested records, arguing that most would be exempt. The Information Commissioner found the search unreasonable, ordering the RCMP to conduct a new search and respond to the request.

Key Issues
  • Reasonableness of search
  • Failure to retrieve and process records
  • Provision of summary in lieu of records
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Nov 25, 20255824-01957· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

5824-01957 — Canadian Food Inspection Agency

Canadian Food Inspection Agency

The complainant alleged that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) improperly withheld and redacted information from an Issue Detail Report. The complainant also alleged the use of improper 'white' redactions. The Information Commissioner found the complaint well-founded, ordering the CFIA to disclose most of the withheld third-party information, except for supplier names, procedural details, and product weighing processes. The Commissioner also recommended the CFIA stop using white redactions.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5824-01957 — Canadian Food Inspection Agency

Nov 25, 20255824-01957
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) improperly withheld and redacted information from an Issue Detail Report. The complainant also alleged the use of improper 'white' redactions. The Information Commissioner found the complaint well-founded, ordering the CFIA to disclose most of the withheld third-party information, except for supplier names, procedural details, and product weighing processes. The Commissioner also recommended the CFIA stop using white redactions.

Key Issues
  • Application of subsection 19(1) (personal information)
  • Application of paragraphs 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(c) (confidential third-party information, financial impact)
  • Improper use of negative (white) redactions
  • CFIA's duty to assist the requester
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 20, 20255823-03654· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Canada Border Services Agency, 5823-03654

The OIC ordered Canada Border Services Agency to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Canada Border Services Agency, 5823-03654

Nov 20, 20255823-03654

The OIC ordered Canada Border Services Agency to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 20, 20255825-00913· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Canada Revenue Agency, 5825-00913

The OIC ordered Canada Revenue Agency to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Canada Revenue Agency, 5825-00913

Nov 20, 20255825-00913

The OIC ordered Canada Revenue Agency to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 19, 20255824-04905· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Transport Canada, 5824-04905

The OIC ordered Transport Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Transport Canada, 5824-04905

Nov 19, 20255824-04905

The OIC ordered Transport Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 19, 20255824-04749· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Canada Revenue Agency, 5824-04749

The OIC ordered Canada Revenue Agency to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Canada Revenue Agency, 5824-04749

Nov 19, 20255824-04749

The OIC ordered Canada Revenue Agency to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Nov 19, 20255825-01637· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Health Canada, 5825-01637

The OIC ordered Health Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Health Canada, 5825-01637

Nov 19, 20255825-01637

The OIC ordered Health Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Nov 18, 20255823-01218· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

5823-01218 — Employment and Social Development Canada

Employment and Social Development Canada

The complainant alleged that Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) improperly withheld records concerning CSL Group Inc. and failed to conduct a reasonable search. The Information Commissioner found that ESDC did not provide sufficient justification for withholding most of the information under various exemptions, including those related to law enforcement, personal information, third-party commercial information, and advice/deliberations. Additionally, the Commissioner found that ESDC's search for records was not reasonable. As a result, the Commissioner ordered ESDC to disclose most of the information and conduct a new search.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5823-01218 — Employment and Social Development Canada

Nov 18, 20255823-01218
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) improperly withheld records concerning CSL Group Inc. and failed to conduct a reasonable search. The Information Commissioner found that ESDC did not provide sufficient justification for withholding most of the information under various exemptions, including those related to law enforcement, personal information, third-party commercial information, and advice/deliberations. Additionally, the Commissioner found that ESDC's search for records was not reasonable. As a result, the Commissioner ordered ESDC to disclose most of the information and conduct a new search.

Key Issues
  • Improper withholding of information under various ATIA exemptions
  • Reasonableness of ESDC's search for records
  • ESDC's failure to provide sufficient justification for exemptions
  • ESDC's unreasonable exercise of discretion for paragraph 21(1)(a)