The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

22,101 decisions in the archive
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 73 — Dépistage Saint-Jacques inc.

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 78 — Municipalité de Saint-Roch-de-Richelieu

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 96 — Public Curator

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2016-004 — Memorial University of Newfoundland

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F16-16 — BC OIPC order 1842

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F16-17 — BC OIPC order 1843

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F16-18 — BC OIPC order 1844

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3592

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3593

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Mar 31, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-012Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-012: Customer gets signed up for retailer credit card without his consent

A bank associated with a retailer

An individual complained after receiving a credit card he did not apply for, following an interaction with a salesperson for a loyalty program. He alleged that he never consented to a credit card application or a credit check, and that much of the information on the application was inaccurate. The bank claimed the individual knowingly provided his information and consented via an electronic tablet. The OPC found that the bank failed to demonstrate it obtained the complainant's consent and ensure the accuracy of the collected information. The investigation concluded the bank contravened PIPEDA Principles 4.3 (consent), 4.6 (accuracy), and 4.1.4 (accountability). The bank apologized, cancelled the card, and removed the inquiry from the credit report. It also discontinued its in-store pilot program and committed to implementing measures to ensure proper consent and information accuracy if it relaunches such a program.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-012: Customer gets signed up for retailer credit card without his consent

Mar 31, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-012
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained after receiving a credit card he did not apply for, following an interaction with a salesperson for a loyalty program. He alleged that he never consented to a credit card application or a credit check, and that much of the information on the application was inaccurate. The bank claimed the individual knowingly provided his information and consented via an electronic tablet. The OPC found that the bank failed to demonstrate it obtained the complainant's consent and ensure the accuracy of the collected information. The investigation concluded the bank contravened PIPEDA Principles 4.3 (consent), 4.6 (accuracy), and 4.1.4 (accountability). The bank apologized, cancelled the card, and removed the inquiry from the credit report. It also discontinued its in-store pilot program and committed to implementing measures to ensure proper consent and information accuracy if it relaunches such a program.

Key Issues
  • Whether the bank obtained valid consent for a credit card application and credit check under Principle 4.3
  • Whether the bank ensured the accuracy of personal information collected under Principle 4.6
  • Whether the bank had adequate procedures to give effect to PIPEDA principles under Principle 4.1.4
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 65 — Québec (Ministère de la Sécurité publique) (Sûreté du Québec)

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 67 — Ville de Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 68 — Ville de Granby

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 69 — Commission des services juridiques

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 70 — City of Granby

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction