The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

22,101 decisions in the archive
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3754

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Privacy Report MC16-7

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Privacy Report MC16-7 - 2017-07-27

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 185 — CIUSSS du Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3474

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3753

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3752

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3751

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 25, 2017Early resolved case summary #2017-001Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2017-001: Privacy obligations under PIPEDA apply to financial technology sector

A FinTech organization

A complainant sought to open an online financial investment account with a FinTech organization. To access the investment account management agreement, the complainant was required to provide personal information, some of which was sensitive. After reviewing the agreement, the complainant decided not to open an account and requested deletion of their personal information. The organization cited "regulatory requirements" for the collection. The OPC clarified that while regulatory requirements exist, they apply once an individual becomes a client, not before. The OPC advised the organization to revise its website so prospective clients could review the agreement without prior personal information disclosure. The organization agreed to revise its website and Privacy Policy, leading to an early resolution.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2017-001: Privacy obligations under PIPEDA apply to financial technology sector

Jul 25, 2017Early resolved case summary #2017-001
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A complainant sought to open an online financial investment account with a FinTech organization. To access the investment account management agreement, the complainant was required to provide personal information, some of which was sensitive. After reviewing the agreement, the complainant decided not to open an account and requested deletion of their personal information. The organization cited "regulatory requirements" for the collection. The OPC clarified that while regulatory requirements exist, they apply once an individual becomes a client, not before. The OPC advised the organization to revise its website so prospective clients could review the agreement without prior personal information disclosure. The organization agreed to revise its website and Privacy Policy, leading to an early resolution.

Key Issues
  • Whether a FinTech organization can require personal information before a prospective client reviews terms and conditions
  • Whether consent under PIPEDA is meaningful if personal information is collected before a user can review service agreements
  • Whether regulatory requirements justify collecting personal information from prospective clients who do not proceed with opening an account
Northwest TerritoriesAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Northwest Territories flag

Review Recommendation 17-165 — Department of Human Resources

Subscribe to open Northwest Territories decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2017-018 — Department of Finance

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Prince Edward IslandFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Prince Edward Island flag

PP-17-001 — Department of Workforce and Advanced Learning

Subscribe to open Prince Edward Island decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaPersonal Information Protection Act
British Columbia flag

P17-03 — BC OIPC order 1958

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3750

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
New BrunswickRight to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
New Brunswick flag

2016-3311-AP-1792 — Kennebecasis Regional Police Force

Subscribe to open New Brunswick decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction