The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

22,103 decisions in the archive
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3842

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2018 QCCAI 115 — City of Montreal

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2018 QCCAI 126 — Ville de Gatineau

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2018 QCCAI 144 — Université du Québec à Montréal

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F18-17 — BC OIPC order 2047

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3841

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3840-I

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2018-18 — Alberta Labour

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2018-21 — Alberta Environment and Parks

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F18-16 — BC OIPC order 2046

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3606

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
May 15, 2018Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Complaints in regard to Transport Canada’s requirement for owners of unmanned aircraft to display their personal information on the device

Transport Canada

Four complaints were filed against Transport Canada (TC) regarding its Interim Order requiring owners of unmanned aircraft (drones) to display their name, address, and telephone number on the device. Complainants argued this contravened the disclosure provisions of the Privacy Act by forcing public exposure of personal information without consent, and raised concerns about harassment or identity theft. TC stated the Interim Order was an interim measure to address significant safety risks posed by recreational drone users, citing a 200% increase in incidents since 2014. The OPC determined that while the information is personal, the requirement does not constitute a 'collection' of personal information by TC under sections 4 and 5 of the Privacy Act, and thus the disclosure provisions of section 8 do not apply. The OPC found no violation of the Act but noted TC's commitment to rework identification requirements in future regulations to address privacy concerns.

Quick view

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Complaints in regard to Transport Canada’s requirement for owners of unmanned aircraft to display their personal information on the device

May 15, 2018
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

Four complaints were filed against Transport Canada (TC) regarding its Interim Order requiring owners of unmanned aircraft (drones) to display their name, address, and telephone number on the device. Complainants argued this contravened the disclosure provisions of the Privacy Act by forcing public exposure of personal information without consent, and raised concerns about harassment or identity theft. TC stated the Interim Order was an interim measure to address significant safety risks posed by recreational drone users, citing a 200% increase in incidents since 2014. The OPC determined that while the information is personal, the requirement does not constitute a 'collection' of personal information by TC under sections 4 and 5 of the Privacy Act, and thus the disclosure provisions of section 8 do not apply. The OPC found no violation of the Act but noted TC's commitment to rework identification requirements in future regulations to address privacy concerns.

Key Issues
  • Whether the requirement to display personal information on unmanned aircraft constitutes a collection of personal information by Transport Canada under sections 4 and 5 of the Privacy Act
  • Whether the disclosure provisions of section 8 of the Privacy Act apply to the personal information displayed on unmanned aircraft as per the Interim Order
  • Whether the Interim Order contravenes the Privacy Act by obligating individuals to expose personal information to the public without consent
New BrunswickRight to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
New Brunswick flag

2017-4220-AP-2284 — Department of Health

Subscribe to open New Brunswick decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2018 QCCAI 114 — Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-L'Île-de-Montréal

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2018 QCCAI 116 — Ville de Lachute

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction