The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

22,243 decisions in the archive
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4401

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4389

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4388

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4387

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Northwest TerritoriesAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Northwest Territories flag

2023 NTIPC 27 — Department of Industry, Tourism, and Investment

Subscribe to open Northwest Territories decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2023 QCCAI 151 — Ville de Laval (Service de police)

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 079-2023, 080-2023 — Ministry of Environment

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4400

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4399

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4386

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4385

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4384

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4383-I

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
May 30, 20235822-06447Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Veterans Affairs Canada, 5822-06447

The Information Commissioner ordered Veterans Affairs Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following receipt of the final report.

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Veterans Affairs Canada, 5822-06447

May 30, 20235822-06447

The Information Commissioner ordered Veterans Affairs Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36th business day following receipt of the final report.

Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
May 30, 2023Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Vaccine mandates for entry into Canada

Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA)

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated complaints regarding the collection, use, retention, and disclosure of personal information, including vaccination status, by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) under Emergency Orders for entry into Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. Complainants argued the measures were unlawful, unnecessary, and disproportionate. The OPC found that the collection of personal information was directly related to an operating program or activity of PHAC and CBSA, and its use and disclosure were for the purpose collected or consistent with it, or authorized by an Act of Parliament. The OPC also determined that the retention and disposal of information complied with the Privacy Act and related regulations. While necessity and proportionality are not explicit requirements of the Privacy Act, the OPC assessed these principles and found the collection overall to be necessary and proportional. However, the OPC identified gaps in PHAC's assessment and documentation of less privacy-intrusive alternatives and clarity of objectives in the final six months of the Orders. All complaints alleging contraventions of the Privacy Act were found to be not well-founded.

Quick view

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Vaccine mandates for entry into Canada

May 30, 2023
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated complaints regarding the collection, use, retention, and disclosure of personal information, including vaccination status, by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) under Emergency Orders for entry into Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. Complainants argued the measures were unlawful, unnecessary, and disproportionate. The OPC found that the collection of personal information was directly related to an operating program or activity of PHAC and CBSA, and its use and disclosure were for the purpose collected or consistent with it, or authorized by an Act of Parliament. The OPC also determined that the retention and disposal of information complied with the Privacy Act and related regulations. While necessity and proportionality are not explicit requirements of the Privacy Act, the OPC assessed these principles and found the collection overall to be necessary and proportional. However, the OPC identified gaps in PHAC's assessment and documentation of less privacy-intrusive alternatives and clarity of objectives in the final six months of the Orders. All complaints alleging contraventions of the Privacy Act were found to be not well-founded.

Key Issues
  • Whether the personal information collected was directly related to an operating program or activity of PHAC and CBSA (s.4 Privacy Act)
  • Whether the personal information was used or disclosed for the purpose for which it was compiled/obtained, or in accordance with an Act of Parliament (s.7, s.8 Privacy Act)
  • Whether the personal information was disposed of in accordance with the Privacy Regulations and the Directive on Privacy Practices (s.6(3) Privacy Act)
  • Whether the collection of personal information under the Emergency Orders was necessary
  • Whether the collection of personal information under the Emergency Orders was effective
  • Whether there were less privacy-intrusive ways of achieving the same end
  • Whether the loss of privacy was proportional to the need