BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

150 decisions matching
Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order 04-34 — 04-34 — BC OIPC order 857

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

04-33 — BC OIPC order 852

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

04-32 — BC OIPC order 849

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

04-31 — BC OIPC order 845

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

04-30 — BC OIPC order 767

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2004-013 — Alberta Environment

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled
Nov 5, 2004Settled Case summary· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Settled case summary #4 — A federally regulated transportation company

A federally regulated transportation company

Employees complained that a list containing their names, identification and seniority numbers, and social insurance numbers (SINs) was shared with their union without their knowledge or consent. The company admitted fault, stating the SIN was inadvertently included on one list and was visible on another shared with the union. The company implemented changes, including no longer requiring SINs for severance applications and amending consent forms for sharing employee information with the union.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled case summary #4 — A federally regulated transportation company

Nov 5, 2004Settled Case summary
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

Employees complained that a list containing their names, identification and seniority numbers, and social insurance numbers (SINs) was shared with their union without their knowledge or consent. The company admitted fault, stating the SIN was inadvertently included on one list and was visible on another shared with the union. The company implemented changes, including no longer requiring SINs for severance applications and amending consent forms for sharing employee information with the union.

Key Issues
  • Disclosure of personal information to a third party (union)
  • Inclusion of SIN on employee lists
  • Lack of employee consent for disclosure
Flag of Nova Scotia
Nova Scotia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

FI-04-44 — Public Service Commission

Subscribe to access Nova Scotia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

04-29 — BC OIPC order 759

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled
Nov 1, 2004Settled Case summary· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Settled Case summary: Credit check to open a personal deposit account - November 2004

A bank

An individual complained that a bank inappropriately required him to consent to a credit check when applying online for a no-fee personal deposit account. He was also concerned about other information requested, including his Social Insurance Number. The bank agreed to modify its online application forms to clarify consent requirements for credit checks and to make the SIN optional. The length of employment will only be required for applicants seeking credit.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled Case summary: Credit check to open a personal deposit account - November 2004

Nov 1, 2004Settled Case summary
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a bank inappropriately required him to consent to a credit check when applying online for a no-fee personal deposit account. He was also concerned about other information requested, including his Social Insurance Number. The bank agreed to modify its online application forms to clarify consent requirements for credit checks and to make the SIN optional. The length of employment will only be required for applicants seeking credit.

Key Issues
  • Consent to credit check for deposit account
  • Collection of Social Insurance Number (SIN)
  • Clarity of information exchange with credit bureaus
Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Privacy and the USA Patriot Act: Implications for British Columbia Public Sector Outsourcing

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order 04-28 — 04-28 — BC OIPC order 755

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled
Oct 26, 2004Settled Case summary· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Settled case summary #2 — A chain of pharmacies

A chain of pharmacies

An individual complained that a pharmacy required them to sign a consent form authorizing overly broad disclosure practices before providing medication. The complainant was concerned about information being disclosed for marketing purposes and their ability to obtain necessary medication if consent was refused. The OPC clarified with the pharmacy chain that they did not disclose customer information for secondary marketing. The company revised its consent form and implemented a policy allowing verbal consent for privacy practices.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled case summary #2 — A chain of pharmacies

Oct 26, 2004Settled Case summary
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a pharmacy required them to sign a consent form authorizing overly broad disclosure practices before providing medication. The complainant was concerned about information being disclosed for marketing purposes and their ability to obtain necessary medication if consent was refused. The OPC clarified with the pharmacy chain that they did not disclose customer information for secondary marketing. The company revised its consent form and implemented a policy allowing verbal consent for privacy practices.

Key Issues
  • Consent to disclosure of personal information
  • Disclosure of personal information for marketing purposes
  • Impact of consent requirements on access to essential services
Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

04-27 — BC OIPC order 750

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Nova Scotia
Nova Scotia
Subscribers only
Municipal Government Act — Part XX (Information Access and Protection of Privacy)

FI-04-09(M) — Truro Police Service

Subscribe to access Nova Scotia decisions.