The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,625 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Sep 23, 2025PIPEDA Findings #2025-003Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2025-003: Joint investigation of TikTok Pte. Ltd. by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, and the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta

TikTok Pte. Ltd.

A joint investigation by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) and provincial privacy regulators (CAI, OIPC BC, OIPC AB) examined TikTok Pte. Ltd.'s compliance with federal and provincial private sector privacy laws. The investigation focused on TikTok's collection, use, and disclosure of personal information for ad targeting and content personalization, with a particular emphasis on practices affecting children. The Offices found that TikTok's age assurance measures were inadequate, leading to the collection and use of sensitive personal information from a large number of underage users for purposes deemed inappropriate. Furthermore, TikTok failed to obtain valid and meaningful consent from both adult and youth users due to unclear, inaccessible, and incomplete privacy communications, including regarding biometric information and cross-border data transfers. The CAI specifically identified contraventions related to Quebec's transparency and privacy-by-default obligations. While TikTok disagreed with the findings, it committed to implementing enhanced age assurance mechanisms, improving privacy communications, and limiting ad targeting for under-18 users. The Offices concluded the matter as well-founded and conditionally resolved, contingent on TikTok's satisfactory implementation of these significant commitments.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2025-003: Joint investigation of TikTok Pte. Ltd. by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, and the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta

Sep 23, 2025PIPEDA Findings #2025-003
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

A joint investigation by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) and provincial privacy regulators (CAI, OIPC BC, OIPC AB) examined TikTok Pte. Ltd.'s compliance with federal and provincial private sector privacy laws. The investigation focused on TikTok's collection, use, and disclosure of personal information for ad targeting and content personalization, with a particular emphasis on practices affecting children. The Offices found that TikTok's age assurance measures were inadequate, leading to the collection and use of sensitive personal information from a large number of underage users for purposes deemed inappropriate. Furthermore, TikTok failed to obtain valid and meaningful consent from both adult and youth users due to unclear, inaccessible, and incomplete privacy communications, including regarding biometric information and cross-border data transfers. The CAI specifically identified contraventions related to Quebec's transparency and privacy-by-default obligations. While TikTok disagreed with the findings, it committed to implementing enhanced age assurance mechanisms, improving privacy communications, and limiting ad targeting for under-18 users. The Offices concluded the matter as well-founded and conditionally resolved, contingent on TikTok's satisfactory implementation of these significant commitments.

Key Issues
  • Whether TikTok was collecting, using, and disclosing personal information, particularly with respect to children, for an appropriate, reasonable, and legitimate purpose.
  • Whether TikTok's age assurance mechanisms were effective in preventing underage users from accessing the platform.
  • Whether TikTok obtained valid and meaningful consent from its users for tracking, profiling, targeting, and content personalization.
  • Whether TikTok's privacy communications provided sufficient upfront, clear, and comprehensive information to adult users to ensure meaningful consent.
  • Whether TikTok adequately explained its collection and use of users' biometric information to ensure meaningful consent.
  • Whether TikTok's privacy communications were adequate to obtain meaningful consent from youth (13-17), considering their cognitive development and potential harms from targeted ads.
  • Whether TikTok met its obligations under Quebec's Private Sector Act to inform persons concerned about the collection and use of personal information for user profiles, ad targeting, and content personalization.
  • Whether TikTok ensured that privacy settings provided the highest level of privacy by default under Quebec's Private Sector Act.
ManitobaThe Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Manitoba flag

Investigation Report: FIPPA No Response – Manitoba Environment and Climate Change

Subscribe to open Manitoba decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

REVIEW REPORT 074-2025 — Saskatchewan Power Corporation

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Sep 22, 20255824-01567Indexed Jun 30, 2026

5824-01567 — Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to allegations of political interference with the Attorney General's functions concerning the SNC-Lavalin prosecution. The request covered records from July 8, 2022, to July 5, 2023. The investigation found that while the RCMP tasked relevant offices, these offices failed to search for records within the full specified timeframe. Specifically, Federal Policing and National Division did not search for records created after certain dates within the request's scope, and the Commissioner's Office's search timeframe was unclear. Furthermore, a 4600-page Police Reporting and Occurrence System (PROS) file, which the RCMP deemed irrelevant due to its 'occurrence time' being outside the request's timeframe, was found by the Commissioner to be relevant and to contain actions reported within the requested period. The Commissioner concluded that the RCMP did not conduct a reasonable search and ordered a new search and response. The RCMP agreed to implement the order.

Quick view

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5824-01567 — Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Sep 22, 20255824-01567
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to allegations of political interference with the Attorney General's functions concerning the SNC-Lavalin prosecution. The request covered records from July 8, 2022, to July 5, 2023. The investigation found that while the RCMP tasked relevant offices, these offices failed to search for records within the full specified timeframe. Specifically, Federal Policing and National Division did not search for records created after certain dates within the request's scope, and the Commissioner's Office's search timeframe was unclear. Furthermore, a 4600-page Police Reporting and Occurrence System (PROS) file, which the RCMP deemed irrelevant due to its 'occurrence time' being outside the request's timeframe, was found by the Commissioner to be relevant and to contain actions reported within the requested period. The Commissioner concluded that the RCMP did not conduct a reasonable search and ordered a new search and response. The RCMP agreed to implement the order.

Key Issues
  • Whether the Royal Canadian Mounted Police conducted a reasonable search for records
  • Whether Federal Policing searched for records up to July 5, 2023
  • Whether National Division searched for records created after May 29, 2023
  • Whether the Commissioner's Office's search timeframe was adequate
  • Whether the 4600-page PROS Occurrence Report was relevant to the request timeframe
QuebecAct respecting health and social services information
Quebec flag

2025 QCCAI 315 — CIUSSS de l'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4696

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioPersonal Health Information Protection Act
Ontario flag

PHIPA DECISION 303 - 2025-09-19

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Sep 19, 20255824-03023Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Global Affairs Canada, 5824-03023

The Information Commissioner ordered Global Affairs Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of this final report.

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Global Affairs Canada, 5824-03023

Sep 19, 20255824-03023

The Information Commissioner ordered Global Affairs Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of this final report.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Sep 19, 20255824-03969Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Global Affairs Canada, 5824-03969

The Information Commissioner ordered Global Affairs Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of this final report.

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Global Affairs Canada, 5824-03969

Sep 19, 20255824-03969

The Information Commissioner ordered Global Affairs Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of this final report.

QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2025 QCCAI 293 — Latitude Management inc. and Québecor Média inc.

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 077-2025 — Saskatchewan Government Insurance

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

FOIP2025-28 — Lethbridge Police Service

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4728

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4729

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
NunavutAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nunavut flag

Review Report 25-295

Subscribe to open Nunavut decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction