
5824-01567 — Royal Canadian Mounted Police
The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to allegations of political interference with the Attorney General's functions concerning the SNC-Lavalin prosecution. The request covered records from July 8, 2022, to July 5, 2023. The investigation found that while the RCMP tasked relevant offices, these offices failed to search for records within the full specified timeframe. Specifically, Federal Policing and National Division did not search for records created after certain dates within the request's scope, and the Commissioner's Office's search timeframe was unclear. Furthermore, a 4600-page Police Reporting and Occurrence System (PROS) file, which the RCMP deemed irrelevant due to its 'occurrence time' being outside the request's timeframe, was found by the Commissioner to be relevant and to contain actions reported within the requested period. The Commissioner concluded that the RCMP did not conduct a reasonable search and ordered a new search and response. The RCMP agreed to implement the order.
- 1Whether the Royal Canadian Mounted Police conducted a reasonable search for records
- 2Whether Federal Policing searched for records up to July 5, 2023
- 3Whether National Division searched for records created after May 29, 2023
- 4Whether the Commissioner's Office's search timeframe was adequate
- 5Whether the 4600-page PROS Occurrence Report was relevant to the request timeframe
- Adequacy of search: Search found unreasonable
- Scope of search: Relevant records overlooked
- Compliance with order: Institution agreed to implement order
Complaint well founded — new search and response ordered
The RCMP failed to conduct a reasonable search by not tasking offices to search for records within the full specified timeframe and by improperly deeming a significant PROS Occurrence Report irrelevant, despite it containing responsive information.
The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness is ordered to conduct a new search for additional records, provide a new response to the complainant including the PROS Occurrence Report, and give access to any additional responsive records unless a specific provision of Part 1 of the Act applies.
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro