The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

22,238 decisions in the archive
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Apr 29, 2024Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Investigation of the Department of National Defence’s refusal to disclose personal information of a deceased individual

Department of National Defence

The complainant, as the executor of a deceased Canadian Armed Forces member's estate, requested personal information from the Department of National Defence (DND) for estate administration purposes. DND initially refused disclosure, citing that the request did not meet the criteria under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations and withheld information under section 26 of the Privacy Act, also claiming some records were not under its control or had surpassed retention periods. The OPC found that the complainant was authorized under paragraph 10(b) to access certain information (items 4, 5, 9, and later 2, 6, 7, 8) as it was relevant to potential civil claims regarding the deceased's financial situation and alleged undue influence. The investigation concluded that DND failed to conduct an adequate search for records and improperly applied section 26 without reviewing the records. DND was also found to have improperly deferred the complainant to an informal avenue without formally processing the request. The OPC recommended DND conduct a reasonable search for the specified records and provide a new response, which DND agreed to do. The complaint was therefore found well-founded and conditionally resolved.

Quick view

Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

Investigation of the Department of National Defence’s refusal to disclose personal information of a deceased individual

Apr 29, 2024
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant, as the executor of a deceased Canadian Armed Forces member's estate, requested personal information from the Department of National Defence (DND) for estate administration purposes. DND initially refused disclosure, citing that the request did not meet the criteria under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations and withheld information under section 26 of the Privacy Act, also claiming some records were not under its control or had surpassed retention periods. The OPC found that the complainant was authorized under paragraph 10(b) to access certain information (items 4, 5, 9, and later 2, 6, 7, 8) as it was relevant to potential civil claims regarding the deceased's financial situation and alleged undue influence. The investigation concluded that DND failed to conduct an adequate search for records and improperly applied section 26 without reviewing the records. DND was also found to have improperly deferred the complainant to an informal avenue without formally processing the request. The OPC recommended DND conduct a reasonable search for the specified records and provide a new response, which DND agreed to do. The complaint was therefore found well-founded and conditionally resolved.

Key Issues
  • Whether the complainant, as executor, was entitled to make a request on behalf of the deceased member under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations for the purpose of administering the estate.
  • Whether the complainant sufficiently articulated or substantiated the precise purposes of the information to administer the estate and how the records in question could further those purposes.
  • Whether DND properly applied section 26 of the Privacy Act in refusing to disclose the requested information.
  • Whether DND conducted an adequate search for the requested records.
  • Whether DND improperly deferred the complainant to another avenue without formally processing a portion of the access request.
  • Whether personal information of a deceased individual (less than 20 years deceased) retains the same privacy protection as a living individual.
  • Whether the 'only for the purpose of such administration' clause in paragraph 10(b) of the Regulations imposes stricter requirements than 'relates to the administration of the individual’s estate' in MFIPPA.
  • Whether records sought to assist in prosecuting a civil claim brought on behalf of the estate for damages recoverable by the estate relate to the administration of the estate.
  • Whether records relevant to the deceased’s financial situation and allegations of fraud or theft of the deceased’s property relate to the administration of the estate.
  • Whether DND's obligation to process a formal access request is relieved if other informal avenues exist.
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F24-33 — BC OIPC order 2793

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4513

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioPersonal Health Information Protection Act
Ontario flag

PHIPA DECISION 241 - 2024-04-26

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
New BrunswickRight to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
New Brunswick flag

23-24-AP-034 — Regional Municipality of Tracadie

Subscribe to open New Brunswick decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2024 QCCAI 98 — Centre de services scolaire des Chic-Chocs

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
New BrunswickRight to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
New Brunswick flag

23-24-AP-075 — Regional Municipality of Tracadie

Subscribe to open New Brunswick decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F24-32 — BC OIPC order 2792

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Apr 25, 20245823-02133Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Natural Resources Canada, 5823-02133

The Information Commissioner ordered Natural Resources Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 45th business day after receipt of the final report.

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Natural Resources Canada, 5823-02133

Apr 25, 20245823-02133

The Information Commissioner ordered Natural Resources Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 45th business day after receipt of the final report.

NunavutAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nunavut flag

Review Report 24-259

Subscribe to open Nunavut decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2024 QCCAI 101 — DRE CHANTAL JANELLE

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting health and social services information
Quebec flag

2024 QCCAI 95 — CIUSSS

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2024-018 — Department of Justice and Public Safety

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2024-019 — Office of the Premier

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

24-11 — L'nu Affairs

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction