The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

22,083 decisions in the archive
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 11, 20245822-05008Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Library and Archives Canada, 5822-05008

The Information Commissioner ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a complete response to the access request on the 36th business day following the date of the final report

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Library and Archives Canada, 5822-05008

Jul 11, 20245822-05008

The Information Commissioner ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a complete response to the access request on the 36th business day following the date of the final report

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 11, 20245822-04316Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Library and Archives Canada, 5822-04316

The Information Commissioner ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a complete response to the access request on the 36th business day following the date of the final report

Quick view

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Library and Archives Canada, 5822-04316

Jul 11, 20245822-04316

The Information Commissioner ordered Library and Archives Canada to provide a complete response to the access request on the 36th business day following the date of the final report

QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2024 QCCAI 194 — Barreau du Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2024 QCCAI 215 — Ville de Westmount

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

24-14 — Justice

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4543

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioPersonal Health Information Protection Act
Ontario flag

PHIPA DECISION 256 - 2024-07-10

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Northwest TerritoriesAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Northwest Territories flag

21-027-4; 21-073-4 — Department of Education, Culture and Employment

Subscribe to open Northwest Territories decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
New BrunswickRight to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
New Brunswick flag

23-24-AP-099 — Department of Justice and Public Safety

Subscribe to open New Brunswick decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Prince Edward IslandFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Prince Edward Island flag

C-24-00099 — Department of Social Development and Housing

Subscribe to open Prince Edward Island decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Prince Edward IslandFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Prince Edward Island flag

OR-24-006 — Department of Finance

Subscribe to open Prince Edward Island decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

24-13 — Finance and Treasury Board

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2024-21 — Justice

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4527

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActNot well-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 9, 20245823-02494Indexed Jun 30, 2026

5823-02494 — Canada Border Services Agency

Canada Border Services Agency

The complainant alleged that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records in response to an access request for emails, text messages, and briefing notes related to companies working on the ArriveCAN application. The complainant specifically questioned the absence of text messages in the records provided. The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) investigated CBSA's search efforts, including the program areas involved, search parameters, and policies regarding text message management. CBSA explained that text messages are often considered transitory, especially if followed by an email, and that employees are responsible for saving non-transitory messages to a corporate repository. The OIC found that the Offices of Primary Interest conducted searches in appropriate repositories and that it was reasonable to believe that relevant text messages either did not exist or were not considered relevant at the time of the request, in line with CBSA and Treasury Board Secretariat policies. Consequently, the Information Commissioner concluded that CBSA conducted a reasonable search.

Quick view

Access to Information ActNot well-founded

5823-02494 — Canada Border Services Agency

Jul 9, 20245823-02494
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records in response to an access request for emails, text messages, and briefing notes related to companies working on the ArriveCAN application. The complainant specifically questioned the absence of text messages in the records provided. The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) investigated CBSA's search efforts, including the program areas involved, search parameters, and policies regarding text message management. CBSA explained that text messages are often considered transitory, especially if followed by an email, and that employees are responsible for saving non-transitory messages to a corporate repository. The OIC found that the Offices of Primary Interest conducted searches in appropriate repositories and that it was reasonable to believe that relevant text messages either did not exist or were not considered relevant at the time of the request, in line with CBSA and Treasury Board Secretariat policies. Consequently, the Information Commissioner concluded that CBSA conducted a reasonable search.

Key Issues
  • Whether the Canada Border Services Agency conducted a reasonable search for records
  • Whether text messages related to the ArriveCAN application existed and should have been provided
  • Whether CBSA's information management policies regarding text messages were appropriately applied