The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,046 decisions matching
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 96 — Protecteur du citoyen

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 98 — Gagné, Isabelle, Patry, Laflamme & Associés, Notaires inc.

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanHealth Information Protection Act
Saskatchewan flag

INVESTIGATION REPORT 224-2016 — Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Apr 19, 2017Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Disclosure of information about complainant's attempted suicide to US Customs and Border Protection not authorized under the Privacy Act

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada investigated a complaint against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) concerning the disclosure of an individual's attempted suicide information to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) via the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC). The complainant was denied entry to the US based on this information, which had been uploaded by the Toronto Police Service (TPS). The OPC found that the disclosure was not authorized under paragraphs 8(2)(f) or 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act, as CBP's use for an admissibility assessment did not constitute "law enforcement" or "criminal justice purposes" under the Memorandum of Cooperation (MOC), nor was it consistent with the original purpose of collection. The OPC also determined that CPIC policies were unclear and remained insufficient to prevent such unauthorized disclosures. The complaint was found well-founded, but the RCMP disagreed with the findings and recommendations. The OPC recommended setting the CPIC "SHARE US A" feature to suppress sharing of sensitive entries by default and revising policies to ensure disclosure only occurs when an individual poses an ongoing risk to others.

Quick view

Privacy ActWell-founded

Disclosure of information about complainant's attempted suicide to US Customs and Border Protection not authorized under the Privacy Act

Apr 19, 2017
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada investigated a complaint against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) concerning the disclosure of an individual's attempted suicide information to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) via the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC). The complainant was denied entry to the US based on this information, which had been uploaded by the Toronto Police Service (TPS). The OPC found that the disclosure was not authorized under paragraphs 8(2)(f) or 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act, as CBP's use for an admissibility assessment did not constitute "law enforcement" or "criminal justice purposes" under the Memorandum of Cooperation (MOC), nor was it consistent with the original purpose of collection. The OPC also determined that CPIC policies were unclear and remained insufficient to prevent such unauthorized disclosures. The complaint was found well-founded, but the RCMP disagreed with the findings and recommendations. The OPC recommended setting the CPIC "SHARE US A" feature to suppress sharing of sensitive entries by default and revising policies to ensure disclosure only occurs when an individual poses an ongoing risk to others.

Key Issues
  • Whether the RCMP inappropriately disclosed the complainant's personal information to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) via the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC).
  • Whether the disclosure of personal information relating to suicide attempts was authorized under paragraph 8(2)(f) of the Privacy Act.
  • Whether CBP's use of the complainant's personal information for an admissibility assessment constituted "criminal justice purposes" or "law enforcement" as defined in the Memorandum of Cooperation (MOC).
  • Whether the disclosure of personal information relating to suicide attempts was authorized under paragraph 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act as a "consistent use."
  • Whether the CPIC policies in effect at the time provided sufficient clarity to guard against unauthorized disclosure of sensitive personal information.
  • Whether the revised CPIC policies, including the "SHARE US A" feature and "SIP-OB" entries, adequately protect against unauthorized disclosure of attempted suicide information.
  • Whether the default setting of the "SHARE US A" feature in CPIC should suppress the sharing of SIP-OB entries relating to threatened or attempted suicides with US border officials.
  • Whether CPIC policies should be revised to provide clear guidance for sharing attempted suicide information with US border officials only where an individual presents an ongoing risk to others.
New BrunswickRight to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
New Brunswick flag

2016-3303-AP-1787 — Department of Social Development

Subscribe to open New Brunswick decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 99 — Collège Saint-Alexandre de la Gatineau

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanLocal Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 036-2017 — City of Saskatoon

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 77 — Loto-Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2017-010 — Department of Justice and Public Safety

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 311-2016 — Ministry of Justice

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F17-18 — BC OIPC order 1935

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F17-17 — BC OIPC order 1934

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

REVIEW REPORT 261-2016 & 284-2016 — Ministry of Central Services

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2017-IR-03 — Government of Alberta

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3426

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction