The catalogueFederal (Canada)
Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) privacy & access decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — each with an AI-generated plain-language summary for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 22, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-019Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA findings #2015-019: OPC complaint prompts telecom’s fraud investigation

A telecommunications company

A complainant reported a fraudulent telecommunications account causing a false debt statement on their credit report. The complainant alleged they never lived at the address associated with the debt, and the telecommunications company initially refused to correct the debt or provide proof of account opening. The credit-reporting agency had validated the debt with the telecom company. Upon the OPC's intervention, the telecommunications company's fraud team reviewed the file and determined the account was fraudulent. The company then cancelled the fraudulent account and updated the credit-reporting agency with accurate information. The complainant was satisfied with these actions, leading to an early resolution.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved

PIPEDA findings #2015-019: OPC complaint prompts telecom’s fraud investigation

Jul 22, 2015PIPEDA findings #2015-019
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A complainant reported a fraudulent telecommunications account causing a false debt statement on their credit report. The complainant alleged they never lived at the address associated with the debt, and the telecommunications company initially refused to correct the debt or provide proof of account opening. The credit-reporting agency had validated the debt with the telecom company. Upon the OPC's intervention, the telecommunications company's fraud team reviewed the file and determined the account was fraudulent. The company then cancelled the fraudulent account and updated the credit-reporting agency with accurate information. The complainant was satisfied with these actions, leading to an early resolution.

Key Issues
  • Whether the telecommunications company failed to ensure the accuracy of personal information
  • Whether the telecommunications company failed to correct inaccurate personal information
  • Whether the credit-reporting agency failed to ensure the accuracy of personal information
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActResolved
Federal (Canada) flag
May 14, 2015Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Investigation into an access to information request for the Long-gun Registry

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

The complainant requested access to the Firearms Registry database from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) on March 27, 2012, prior to the enactment of the Ending the Long-gun Registry Act. The complainant alleged that the RCMP provided an incomplete response, failed to justify the incompleteness, and obstructed the right of access by destroying responsive records. The investigation focused on whether the RCMP's actions, particularly the destruction of records, constituted an obstruction of the right of access under section 67.1 of the Access to Information Act. The Commissioner examined the circumstances surrounding the destruction of the Long-gun Registry data. The Commissioner found that the destruction of the records was carried out in accordance with a valid legislative process and did not constitute an obstruction of the right of access.

Quick view

Access to Information ActResolved

Investigation into an access to information request for the Long-gun Registry

May 14, 2015
Adjudicator: Suzanne Legault
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant requested access to the Firearms Registry database from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) on March 27, 2012, prior to the enactment of the Ending the Long-gun Registry Act. The complainant alleged that the RCMP provided an incomplete response, failed to justify the incompleteness, and obstructed the right of access by destroying responsive records. The investigation focused on whether the RCMP's actions, particularly the destruction of records, constituted an obstruction of the right of access under section 67.1 of the Access to Information Act. The Commissioner examined the circumstances surrounding the destruction of the Long-gun Registry data. The Commissioner found that the destruction of the records was carried out in accordance with a valid legislative process and did not constitute an obstruction of the right of access.

Key Issues
  • Whether the information provided was incomplete
  • Whether the RCMP justified the incomplete response
  • Whether the destruction of responsive records by the RCMP obstructed the right of access under section 67.1 of the Act