Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActResolved

Investigation into an access to information request for the Long-gun Registry

Organization: Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant requested access to the Firearms Registry database from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) on March 27, 2012, prior to the enactment of the Ending the Long-gun Registry Act. The complainant alleged that the RCMP provided an incomplete response, failed to justify the incompleteness, and obstructed the right of access by destroying responsive records. The investigation focused on whether the RCMP's actions, particularly the destruction of records, constituted an obstruction of the right of access under section 67.1 of the Access to Information Act. The Commissioner examined the circumstances surrounding the destruction of the Long-gun Registry data. The Commissioner found that the destruction of the records was carried out in accordance with a valid legislative process and did not constitute an obstruction of the right of access.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the information provided was incomplete
  2. 2Whether the RCMP justified the incomplete response
  3. 3Whether the destruction of responsive records by the RCMP obstructed the right of access under section 67.1 of the Act
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Obstruction of access: Destruction of records not obstruction
  • Completeness of response: Complaint dismissed
Outcome

Complaint not well founded

Reasoning

The Commissioner found that the destruction of the Long-gun Registry data was carried out in accordance with a valid legislative process (the Ending the Long-gun Registry Act) and therefore did not constitute an obstruction of the right of access under section 67.1 of the Act.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.30(1)(f) ATIA
  • s.67.1 ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro