Condita Research

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,481 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Mar 14, 20235822-02531· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Export Development Canada, 5822-02531

The OIC ordered Export Development Canada to provide a complete response to the access request on the 36thébusiness day following the date of the final report..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Export Development Canada, 5822-02531

Mar 14, 20235822-02531

The OIC ordered Export Development Canada to provide a complete response to the access request on the 36thébusiness day following the date of the final report..

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2023 QCCAI 90 — Régie de police du Lac des Deux-Montagnes

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2023 QCCAI 95 — Ville de Montréal, Service de police (SPVM)

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2023 QCCAI 96 — Ville de La Tuque

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2023 QCCAI 98 — Ministère de l'Énergie et des Ressources naturelles and Utica Resources Inc.

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 160-2022 — Ministry of Corrections, Policing and Public Safety

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4361

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4360

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2023 QCCAI 97 — École nationale de police du Québec

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Nova Scotia
Nova Scotia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Donham v. Nova Scotia (Information and Privacy Commissioner)

Subscribe to access Nova Scotia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F23-15 — BC OIPC order 2602

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-4344

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Mar 10, 20235820-04413· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

5820-04413 and 5822-04414 — Public Health Agency of Canada

Public Health Agency of Canada

The complainant alleged that the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) did not conduct a reasonable search for records related to masks, requested under the Access to Information Act. PHAC initially stated no records existed as an employee deleted their entire email mailbox. During the investigation, PHAC conducted additional searches and found responsive records. The Commissioner found the complaints to be well-founded due to the initial inadequate search.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5820-04413 and 5822-04414 — Public Health Agency of Canada

Mar 10, 20235820-04413
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) did not conduct a reasonable search for records related to masks, requested under the Access to Information Act. PHAC initially stated no records existed as an employee deleted their entire email mailbox. During the investigation, PHAC conducted additional searches and found responsive records. The Commissioner found the complaints to be well-founded due to the initial inadequate search.

Key Issues
  • Reasonableness of the search conducted by the institution
  • Disposition of electronic records by an employee
  • Institution's obligation to search beyond the employee's direct records
  • Information management practices of the institution
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)
Mar 10, 20235821-06706· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Canada Revenue Agency, 5821-06706

The OIC ordered Canada Revenue Agency to provide a complete response to the access request as soon as possible, but no later than September 30, 2023..

Quick View

Access to Information ActOIC Order (ATIA s.36.1, binding)

Canada Revenue Agency, 5821-06706

Mar 10, 20235821-06706

The OIC ordered Canada Revenue Agency to provide a complete response to the access request as soon as possible, but no later than September 30, 2023..

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Mar 10, 20235822-04510· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

5822-04510 — Public Safety Canada and Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Public Safety Canada

The complainant alleged that Public Safety Canada's 240-day extension to respond to an access request was unreasonable. The request was for correspondence between Public Safety and the RCMP in May 2022. Public Safety could not justify the lengthy extension, as the volume of records was not large and the RCMP's consultation timeline was based on service standards rather than record complexity. The Information Commissioner found the extension invalid, deeming the delay a refusal of access.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5822-04510 — Public Safety Canada and Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Mar 10, 20235822-04510
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Public Safety Canada's 240-day extension to respond to an access request was unreasonable. The request was for correspondence between Public Safety and the RCMP in May 2022. Public Safety could not justify the lengthy extension, as the volume of records was not large and the RCMP's consultation timeline was based on service standards rather than record complexity. The Information Commissioner found the extension invalid, deeming the delay a refusal of access.

Key Issues
  • Reasonableness of time extension under subsection 9(1) of the ATIA
  • Definition of 'large number of records' under paragraph 9(1)(a)
  • Justification for consultation delays under paragraph 9(1)(b)
  • Timeliness of institution's response