The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,046 decisions matching
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3687

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 8 — Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

Décision 1009399-S — Hydro-Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2017-01 — Alberta Health Services

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3685

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3686

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 38 — Ville de Baie-d'Urfé

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 4 — Municipalité de Sainte-Barbe

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2017-001 — Department of Justice and Public Safety

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 159-2016 — Global Transportation Hub Authority

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3684

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3399

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jan 11, 2017PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004: Consent provided extends to third-party doctor hired to evaluate accident insurance claim

A doctor hired by an independent medical evaluation firm

An individual complained that a doctor collected, used, and disclosed his personal information without consent. The complainant had been in a car accident and his insurance company hired an independent medical evaluation (IME) firm to assess his claim for catastrophic impairment. The doctor in question was hired by the IME firm to compile a summary report based on assessments from other doctors. The complainant argued he had not consented to this specific doctor, though he had consented to other doctors involved in his claim. The doctor contended that the complainant had provided consent through signed accident benefit forms (OCF-1 and OCF-19). The OPC found that the signed forms included explicit consent for health professionals to collect, use, and disclose personal information for the purpose of investigating and processing the insurance claim. The OPC concluded that the doctor's actions were within the scope of the consent provided.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004: Consent provided extends to third-party doctor hired to evaluate accident insurance claim

Jan 11, 2017PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a doctor collected, used, and disclosed his personal information without consent. The complainant had been in a car accident and his insurance company hired an independent medical evaluation (IME) firm to assess his claim for catastrophic impairment. The doctor in question was hired by the IME firm to compile a summary report based on assessments from other doctors. The complainant argued he had not consented to this specific doctor, though he had consented to other doctors involved in his claim. The doctor contended that the complainant had provided consent through signed accident benefit forms (OCF-1 and OCF-19). The OPC found that the signed forms included explicit consent for health professionals to collect, use, and disclose personal information for the purpose of investigating and processing the insurance claim. The OPC concluded that the doctor's actions were within the scope of the consent provided.

Key Issues
  • Whether the doctor collected, used, and disclosed the complainant's personal information without consent
  • Whether the consent provided in OCF-1 and OCF-19 forms extended to the doctor preparing the summary report
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

M.D. c. Structures métropolitaines (SMI) inc.

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 3 — Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l'Estrie

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction