
PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-004: Retailer shares customer’s in-store behaviour with the customer’s employer
A customer complained that a retail store employee disclosed his personal information to his employer, including his name, in-store behavior, and statements made to staff. The store argued the information was not personal because it was made publicly, and that it had implied consent for the disclosure. The OPC found that information overheard by others is still personal information under PIPEDA. The OPC also determined that implied consent was not appropriate given the sensitive nature of the information, which had the potential to negatively affect the customer's employment. The store's disclosure without knowledge or consent contravened Principle 4.3 of PIPEDA. The complaint was found to be well-founded and resolved after the store implemented the OPC's recommendations.
Ontario
British Columbia
Alberta
Saskatchewan
Manitoba
Quebec
Nova Scotia
New Brunswick
Prince Edward Island
Newfoundland and Labrador
Yukon
Northwest Territories
Nunavut