The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,013 decisions matching
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 186-2015 — Saskatchewan Government Insurance

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3278

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 7 — Ville de Lac-Sergent

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

16-01 — Nova Scotia Business Inc.

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaHealth Information Act
Alberta flag

H2016-01 — Covenant Health

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 1 — Québec (City of)

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 10 — Centre de crise de Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 8 — Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS)

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 197-2015 — Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaPersonal Information Protection Act
Alberta flag

P2016-01 — Gibbs Gage Architects

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3567

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Jan 9, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-004Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-004: Retailer shares customer’s in-store behaviour with the customer’s employer

A retail store

A customer complained that a retail store employee disclosed his personal information to his employer, including his name, in-store behavior, and statements made to staff. The store argued the information was not personal because it was made publicly, and that it had implied consent for the disclosure. The OPC found that information overheard by others is still personal information under PIPEDA. The OPC also determined that implied consent was not appropriate given the sensitive nature of the information, which had the potential to negatively affect the customer's employment. The store's disclosure without knowledge or consent contravened Principle 4.3 of PIPEDA. The complaint was found to be well-founded and resolved after the store implemented the OPC's recommendations.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-004: Retailer shares customer’s in-store behaviour with the customer’s employer

Jan 9, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-004
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A customer complained that a retail store employee disclosed his personal information to his employer, including his name, in-store behavior, and statements made to staff. The store argued the information was not personal because it was made publicly, and that it had implied consent for the disclosure. The OPC found that information overheard by others is still personal information under PIPEDA. The OPC also determined that implied consent was not appropriate given the sensitive nature of the information, which had the potential to negatively affect the customer's employment. The store's disclosure without knowledge or consent contravened Principle 4.3 of PIPEDA. The complaint was found to be well-founded and resolved after the store implemented the OPC's recommendations.

Key Issues
  • Whether the information shared was personal information under PIPEDA
  • Whether the customer provided implied consent for the disclosure of his personal information
  • Whether the disclosed information was sensitive
  • Whether the customer had a reasonable expectation that his information would be shared with his employer
  • Whether the publicly available information exception to consent applied
OntarioPersonal Health Information Protection Act
Ontario flag

PHIPA DECISION 20

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioPersonal Health Information Protection Act
Ontario flag

PHIPA DECISION 22

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioPersonal Health Information Protection Act
Ontario flag

PHIPA DECISION 19

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction