Condita Research

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

981 decisions matching
Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2020-R-01 — Alberta Emergency Management Agency

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F20-01 — BC OIPC order 2242

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 15 — Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Solidarité sociale

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2020 QCCAI 28 — Ville de Terrebonne (Service de police)

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Personal Health Information Protection Act

PHIPA DECISION 106

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)
Jan 1, 20202020 OIC 17· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2020 OIC 17

Institution

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline to act on an access request, claiming it was vexatious and an abuse of the right to access records. The institution noted the requester had submitted 893 requests over 17 years, many similar to the current one. The Commissioner found that 11 of the requests were duplicative and that the requester had not provided justification for resubmitting them. The Commissioner concluded that the volume and repetitive nature of the requests, combined with the requester's history of complaints, amounted to an abuse of the right of access.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2020 OIC 17

Jan 1, 20202020 OIC 17
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline to act on an access request, claiming it was vexatious and an abuse of the right to access records. The institution noted the requester had submitted 893 requests over 17 years, many similar to the current one. The Commissioner found that 11 of the requests were duplicative and that the requester had not provided justification for resubmitting them. The Commissioner concluded that the volume and repetitive nature of the requests, combined with the requester's history of complaints, amounted to an abuse of the right of access.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access request was vexatious
  • Whether the access request constituted an abuse of the right to access records
  • Whether the institution met the threshold for declining to act on the request