BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

953 decisions matching
Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2017-02 — Alberta Transportation

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3687

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Quebec
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

Décision 1009399-S — Hydro-Québec

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2017-01 — Alberta Health Services

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3685

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3686

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2017 QCCAI 38 — Ville de Baie-d'Urfé

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2017 QCCAI 4 — Municipalité de Sainte-Barbe

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Newfoundland and Labrador
Newfoundland and Labrador
Subscribers only
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015

A-2017-001 — Department of Justice and Public Safety

Subscribe to access Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 159-2016 — Global Transportation Hub Authority

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3684

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3399

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Jan 11, 2017PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004: Consent provided extends to third-party doctor hired to evaluate accident insurance claim

A medical doctor

The complainant alleged that a doctor used and disclosed his personal information without consent during an insurance claim evaluation. The investigation focused on whether the complainant's consent, provided through accident benefit application forms (OCF-1 and OCF-19), extended to this specific doctor hired to prepare a summary report. The Office determined that the consent forms explicitly allowed the insurance company and other parties, including health professionals, to collect, use, and disclose personal information for the purposes of investigating and processing the insurance claim, including assessing catastrophic impairment. Therefore, the doctor did not contravene PIPEDA's consent provisions.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004: Consent provided extends to third-party doctor hired to evaluate accident insurance claim

Jan 11, 2017PIPEDA Case Summary #2017-004
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that a doctor used and disclosed his personal information without consent during an insurance claim evaluation. The investigation focused on whether the complainant's consent, provided through accident benefit application forms (OCF-1 and OCF-19), extended to this specific doctor hired to prepare a summary report. The Office determined that the consent forms explicitly allowed the insurance company and other parties, including health professionals, to collect, use, and disclose personal information for the purposes of investigating and processing the insurance claim, including assessing catastrophic impairment. Therefore, the doctor did not contravene PIPEDA's consent provisions.

Key Issues
  • Whether consent provided for an insurance claim extended to a third-party doctor hired to prepare a summary report.
  • Whether the specific wording of consent forms (OCF-1 and OCF-19) covered the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by the doctor.
  • Whether the doctor collected, used, or disclosed personal information for purposes beyond those stated in the consent forms.
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2017 QCCAI 5 — Commission scolaire de la Vallée-des-Tisserands

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2017 QCCAI 9 — Ville de Lavaltrie and GROUPE VILLENEUVE INC.

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.