The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,013 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Feb 9, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-007Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-007: An organization's privacy policy and procedures must be implemented effectively

A collection agency

An individual complained that a collection agency repeatedly refused to provide access to their personal information, despite multiple written requests. The individual was disputing a debt the agency was attempting to collect and sought information related to the alleged debt account. The OPC found that the agency failed to respond to several of the individual's access requests, contravening PIPEDA subsections 8(3) and 8(5), and Principle 4.9. Although the agency eventually provided the information during the investigation, the OPC noted that the agency had not followed its own privacy procedures for handling access requests. The agency committed to revising its procedures and providing refresher training to its employees. The complaint was deemed well-founded and resolved.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-007: An organization's privacy policy and procedures must be implemented effectively

Feb 9, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-007
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a collection agency repeatedly refused to provide access to their personal information, despite multiple written requests. The individual was disputing a debt the agency was attempting to collect and sought information related to the alleged debt account. The OPC found that the agency failed to respond to several of the individual's access requests, contravening PIPEDA subsections 8(3) and 8(5), and Principle 4.9. Although the agency eventually provided the information during the investigation, the OPC noted that the agency had not followed its own privacy procedures for handling access requests. The agency committed to revising its procedures and providing refresher training to its employees. The complaint was deemed well-founded and resolved.

Key Issues
  • Whether the organization refused to provide access to personal information
  • Whether the organization responded to access requests within the required timeframe
  • Whether the organization followed its own privacy policies and procedures for access requests
  • Whether the organization maintained records of access request processing
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 29 — Université Concordia

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Feb 8, 2016Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Canada Post collection of online signatures for mail tracking draws complaint

Canada Post Corporation

A complaint was filed against Canada Post Corporation (CPC) regarding its collection, use, and disclosure of electronic signatures for parcel tracking. The complainant raised concerns about the clarity of information provided to addressees regarding their option to opt-out of having their signature displayed online, and the absence of labels on signature devices at a specific postal outlet. The investigation also examined the privacy and security controls of CPC's online tracking website. CPC argued that disclosure of signatures to senders was authorized under the Privacy Act and that it provided an opt-out option. The OPC found that the collection and disclosure of signatures for parcel tracking were consistent with the Act, but raised concerns about the adequacy of security controls for online signatures. CPC committed to implementing enhanced security measures.

Quick view

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Canada Post collection of online signatures for mail tracking draws complaint

Feb 8, 2016
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A complaint was filed against Canada Post Corporation (CPC) regarding its collection, use, and disclosure of electronic signatures for parcel tracking. The complainant raised concerns about the clarity of information provided to addressees regarding their option to opt-out of having their signature displayed online, and the absence of labels on signature devices at a specific postal outlet. The investigation also examined the privacy and security controls of CPC's online tracking website. CPC argued that disclosure of signatures to senders was authorized under the Privacy Act and that it provided an opt-out option. The OPC found that the collection and disclosure of signatures for parcel tracking were consistent with the Act, but raised concerns about the adequacy of security controls for online signatures. CPC committed to implementing enhanced security measures.

Key Issues
  • Whether the collection of electronic signatures by CPC contravenes the Privacy Act
  • Whether the disclosure of electronic signatures to the sender of a parcel contravenes the Privacy Act
  • Whether the disclosure of electronic signatures online contravenes the Privacy Act
  • Whether CPC adequately safeguards digitized signatures displayed online
  • Whether the information provided to addressees about opting out of online signature display is sufficiently clear
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 33 — CISSS de la Montérégie-Est

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 30 — Ville de Gatineau

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 31 — GARDA / WORLD

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 34 — Paroisse de Saint-François-Xavier-de-Brompton

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3285-I

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Investigation Report 189-2015 — Saskatchewan Government Insurance

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3284-I

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 37 — Ville de Rimouski

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3575

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 19 — Commission scolaire Riverside

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 20 — Commission scolaire Riverside

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 26 — Financière Sun Life

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction