The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,013 decisions matching
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3295

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3584

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Mar 10, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-009Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-009: Trucking company inappropriately disclosed employee’s drug test results to workers’ compensation board

An international trucking company

An employee complained that his employer, an international trucking company, disclosed his positive drug test results to a provincial workers' compensation board (WCB) without his consent, and also to his co-workers. The employer stated it believed it was legally obligated to inform the WCB due to a change in the employee's work status and cited the provincial Workers' Compensation Act. The WCB clarified that the Act did not create an express duty for unsolicited disclosure of such information. The OPC found that the disclosure to the WCB was a contravention of PIPEDA Principles 4.3 and 4.5, as the information was used for a different purpose than collected without consent, and no legal obligation exception applied. The OPC also investigated the alleged disclosure to co-workers but found no evidence to support this claim. The employer implemented the OPC's recommendations, leading to a 'well-founded and resolved' outcome for the disclosure to the WCB.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-009: Trucking company inappropriately disclosed employee’s drug test results to workers’ compensation board

Mar 10, 2016PIPEDA Case Summary #2016-009
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An employee complained that his employer, an international trucking company, disclosed his positive drug test results to a provincial workers' compensation board (WCB) without his consent, and also to his co-workers. The employer stated it believed it was legally obligated to inform the WCB due to a change in the employee's work status and cited the provincial Workers' Compensation Act. The WCB clarified that the Act did not create an express duty for unsolicited disclosure of such information. The OPC found that the disclosure to the WCB was a contravention of PIPEDA Principles 4.3 and 4.5, as the information was used for a different purpose than collected without consent, and no legal obligation exception applied. The OPC also investigated the alleged disclosure to co-workers but found no evidence to support this claim. The employer implemented the OPC's recommendations, leading to a 'well-founded and resolved' outcome for the disclosure to the WCB.

Key Issues
  • Whether the disclosure of drug test results to the WCB without consent contravened PIPEDA Principles 4.3 and 4.5
  • Whether the employer had a legal obligation to disclose the drug test results to the WCB under the provincial Workers' Compensation Act, thereby qualifying for an exception to consent under paragraph 7(3)(i) of PIPEDA
  • Whether the employer disclosed the drug test results to co-workers without consent
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 50 — McGill University Health Centre

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 53 — Tourisme Laval

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2016-07 — Alberta Justice and Solicitor General

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3583

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioPersonal Health Information Protection Act
Ontario flag

PHIPA DECISION 24

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 59 — Office municipal d'habitation de Québec and Société municipale d’habitation Champlain

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

Décision 1011055-S — Clinique cosmétique Cruz Inc.

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Prince Edward IslandFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Prince Edward Island flag

FI-16-002 — Department of Justice and Public Safet

Subscribe to open Prince Edward Island decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaPersonal Information Protection Act
Alberta flag

P2016-02 — Grandin Manor Ltd.

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 51 — Université du Québec en Outaouais

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 54 — City of Montreal (SPVM)

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 55 — Collège des médecins du Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction