Condita Research

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,266 decisions matching
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2022 QCCAI 143 — Ville de Longueuil (Service de police)

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2022 QCCAI 144 — Ville de Québec (SPVQ)

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F22-23 — BC OIPC order 2521

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-4198

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Personal Health Information Protection Act

PHIPA DECISION 181

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Quebec
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector

Décision 1014505-S — Association québécoise des transports

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Quebec
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector

Décision 1016098-S — Association québécoise des transports

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-4197

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-4196-I

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
May 13, 2022· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

DND breached the Privacy Act in disclosing the identity of a workplace violence complainant who had an expectation of confidentiality

Department of National Defence

The Department of National Defence (DND) disclosed the identity of a workplace violence (WPV) complainant and the investigation report to a second investigator, who was conducting a separate administrative investigation into the complainant's conduct. The OPC found that while disclosing the report to labour relations was a consistent use, disclosing it to the second investigator was not, as it was not a reasonably expected use of the information given the confidentiality assurances provided to the complainant. This disclosure was therefore found to be a contravention of the Privacy Act.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

DND breached the Privacy Act in disclosing the identity of a workplace violence complainant who had an expectation of confidentiality

May 13, 2022
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Department of National Defence (DND) disclosed the identity of a workplace violence (WPV) complainant and the investigation report to a second investigator, who was conducting a separate administrative investigation into the complainant's conduct. The OPC found that while disclosing the report to labour relations was a consistent use, disclosing it to the second investigator was not, as it was not a reasonably expected use of the information given the confidentiality assurances provided to the complainant. This disclosure was therefore found to be a contravention of the Privacy Act.

Key Issues
  • Was the disclosure of the WPV complainant's identity and report to a second investigator a 'consistent use' under paragraph 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act?
  • Did DND's consent form clearly communicate potential uses and disclosures of the complainant's identity?
  • Did the disclosure align with the reasonable expectations of the complainant regarding confidentiality?
  • What corrective actions are necessary to ensure future compliance with privacy principles in WPV investigations?
Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 025-2021, 079-2022 — Ministry of Social Services

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Health Information Act

H2022-06 — Alberta Health Services

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F22-22 — BC OIPC order 2509

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
May 12, 20225820-02800· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

5820-02800 — Shared Services Canada and Public Services and Procurement Canada

Shared Services Canada

The complainant alleged that Shared Services Canada (SSC) wrongfully refused to process an access request for records related to informal official language complaints. SSC argued that the request, even after narrowing its scope, did not meet the requirements of section 6 of the Access to Information Act because it would require tasking too many employees and would impose an unreasonable administrative burden. The Information Commissioner disagreed, finding the request sufficiently detailed and ordering SSC to process it.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5820-02800 — Shared Services Canada and Public Services and Procurement Canada

May 12, 20225820-02800
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Shared Services Canada (SSC) wrongfully refused to process an access request for records related to informal official language complaints. SSC argued that the request, even after narrowing its scope, did not meet the requirements of section 6 of the Access to Information Act because it would require tasking too many employees and would impose an unreasonable administrative burden. The Information Commissioner disagreed, finding the request sufficiently detailed and ordering SSC to process it.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access request provided sufficient detail to enable an experienced employee to identify records with reasonable effort.
  • Whether administrative burden on an institution is a valid reason to refuse processing a request.
  • Whether the scope of the request necessitated tasking all employees of the department.
  • Whether section 6.1 of the Act was the appropriate process to address claims of vexatious requests.
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2022 QCCAI 131 — Municipalité de St-Dominique

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.