The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

920 decisions matching
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3011

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3307

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2014 QCCAI 38 — VCS INVESTIGATION INC.

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2014-005 — College of the North Atlantic

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2014 QCCAI 31 — Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2014 QCCAI 32 — Sûreté du Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2014 QCCAI 49 — Batshaw Youth and Family Centres

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

Décision 1005011-S — Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2014-11 — Town of Ponoka

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2014 QCCAI 29 — Commission scolaire de Laval

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 110/2014 — Ministry of Health

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3306

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2014-10 — Town of Taber

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2014 QCCAI 30 — Centre jeunesse des Laurentides

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Feb 10, 2014Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012: Investment Firm Justified in its Collection of "Know Your Client" Information

An investment firm

A customer complained that his investment firm required an unreasonable amount of personal information on its "Know Your Client" (KYC) form as a condition for maintaining his Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA) and Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP). The firm requested details such as investment experience, annual income, spouse's income, dependents, assets, liabilities, and net worth. The firm argued this information was necessary to comply with the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) KYC and suitability requirements. The OPC assessed whether the firm contravened PIPEDA Principle 4.3.3 by requiring consent for information beyond explicitly specified and legitimate purposes. The OPC found that the firm had explicitly specified its purposes, which were legitimate given IIROC's regulatory framework. The OPC also concluded that the requested information, including details beyond IIROC's standard Form 2, was necessary for the firm to meet its regulatory obligations. Therefore, the complaint was not well-founded.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012: Investment Firm Justified in its Collection of "Know Your Client" Information

Feb 10, 2014Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012
Adjudicator: Chantal Bernier
Plain-Language Summary

A customer complained that his investment firm required an unreasonable amount of personal information on its "Know Your Client" (KYC) form as a condition for maintaining his Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA) and Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP). The firm requested details such as investment experience, annual income, spouse's income, dependents, assets, liabilities, and net worth. The firm argued this information was necessary to comply with the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) KYC and suitability requirements. The OPC assessed whether the firm contravened PIPEDA Principle 4.3.3 by requiring consent for information beyond explicitly specified and legitimate purposes. The OPC found that the firm had explicitly specified its purposes, which were legitimate given IIROC's regulatory framework. The OPC also concluded that the requested information, including details beyond IIROC's standard Form 2, was necessary for the firm to meet its regulatory obligations. Therefore, the complaint was not well-founded.

Key Issues
  • Whether the investment firm explicitly specified the purposes for collecting personal information under Principle 4.2 PIPEDA
  • Whether the purposes for collecting personal information were legitimate under subsection 5(3) PIPEDA
  • Whether the investment firm required more personal information than necessary to achieve the legitimate purposes as a condition of service under Principle 4.3.3 PIPEDA
  • Whether the collection of personal information was limited to that which was necessary for the identified purposes under Principle 4.4 PIPEDA
  • Whether information on investment experience was necessary to validate investment knowledge and assess risk tolerance
  • Whether spouse's or partner's annual income was necessary to assess overall financial position and suitability
  • Whether detailed assets and liabilities were necessary to establish net worth and understand financial situation