BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,091 decisions matching
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2019 QCCAI 159 — Université McGill

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2019 QCCAI 166 — Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2019-13 — Service Alberta

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2019-12 — Alberta Justice and Solicitor General

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2019 QCCAI 122 — Barreau du Québec

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2019-R-01 — Alberta Health and Alberta Blue Cross

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of Prince Edward Island
Prince Edward Island
Subscribers only
Health Information Act

HI-19-001 — Dental services custodian

Subscribe to access Prince Edward Island decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F19-17 — BC OIPC order 2177

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F19-16 — BC OIPC order 2176

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Mar 29, 2019· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Global Affairs Canada fails to demonstrate its authority to collect the personal information contained in diplomatic passports

Global Affairs Canada

The complainant alleged that Global Affairs Canada (GAC) improperly collected personal information from his diplomatic passport for an administrative investigation. The complainant had used his diplomatic passport for personal travel, and GAC requested the original passport as evidence. GAC did not demonstrate how the personal travel information collected related to its operating programs or activities, nor did it provide sufficient cooperation to confirm its authority to collect this information.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

Global Affairs Canada fails to demonstrate its authority to collect the personal information contained in diplomatic passports

Mar 29, 2019
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Global Affairs Canada (GAC) improperly collected personal information from his diplomatic passport for an administrative investigation. The complainant had used his diplomatic passport for personal travel, and GAC requested the original passport as evidence. GAC did not demonstrate how the personal travel information collected related to its operating programs or activities, nor did it provide sufficient cooperation to confirm its authority to collect this information.

Key Issues
  • Whether GAC had the authority to collect personal travel information from a diplomatic passport.
  • Whether the collection of personal travel information related directly to GAC's operating programs or activities.
  • Whether GAC provided sufficient information regarding the administrative investigation and its authority to collect the passport.
Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2019-11 — Alberta Justice and Solicitor General

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F19-15 — BC OIPC order 2175

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

BC OIPC order 1953

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3944-F

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Mar 28, 2019PIPEDA Case Summary #2019-006· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2019-006: Directory company lacked consent to publish complainant's personal information

Grey House Publishing Canada

The complainant alleged that Grey House Publishing Canada (Grey House) collected, used, and disclosed his personal information without his knowledge or consent. Grey House collected the complainant's contact information from a non-profit association's webpage and included it in its print directory and database. Grey House then sold an email distribution list containing this information to Economic and Social Development Canada (ESDC), which used it to send emails promoting a federal program. The OPC found that Grey House contravened PIPEDA by collecting and using the complainant's personal information without adequate consent, as the information was not considered business contact information and did not fall under the exceptions for publicly available information. The OPC also found that Grey House contravened PIPEDA's openness principle by having an inadequate privacy statement.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2019-006: Directory company lacked consent to publish complainant's personal information

Mar 28, 2019PIPEDA Case Summary #2019-006
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Grey House Publishing Canada (Grey House) collected, used, and disclosed his personal information without his knowledge or consent. Grey House collected the complainant's contact information from a non-profit association's webpage and included it in its print directory and database. Grey House then sold an email distribution list containing this information to Economic and Social Development Canada (ESDC), which used it to send emails promoting a federal program. The OPC found that Grey House contravened PIPEDA by collecting and using the complainant's personal information without adequate consent, as the information was not considered business contact information and did not fall under the exceptions for publicly available information. The OPC also found that Grey House contravened PIPEDA's openness principle by having an inadequate privacy statement.

Key Issues
  • Whether the complainant's contact information constituted personal information or business contact information under PIPEDA
  • Whether Grey House was conducting commercial activity under PIPEDA
  • Whether Grey House obtained adequate consent to collect and use the complainant's personal information
  • Whether Grey House's privacy statement adequately reflected its practices