BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

854 decisions matching
Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3307

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Newfoundland and Labrador
Newfoundland and Labrador
Subscribers only
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015

A-2014-005 — College of the North Atlantic

Subscribe to access Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2014 QCCAI 32 — Sûreté du Québec

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2014 QCCAI 49 — Batshaw Youth and Family Centres

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Quebec
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

Décision 1005011-S — Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2014-11 — Town of Ponoka

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F14-56387 — BC OIPC order 1530

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2014 QCCAI 29 — Commission scolaire de Laval

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 110/2014 — Ministry of Health

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3306

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2014-10 — Town of Taber

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2014 QCCAI 30 — Centre jeunesse des Laurentides

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Feb 10, 2014Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012: Investment Firm Justified in its Collection of "Know Your Client" Information

A Canadian investment firm

A customer complained that his investment firm's Know Your Client (KYC) form required an unreasonable amount of personal information, contrary to PIPEDA. The firm argued the information was necessary to comply with regulatory obligations set by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC). The OPC investigated whether the firm collected more information than necessary for legitimate purposes. Ultimately, the OPC found that the firm's collection of detailed financial and personal information, including spousal income and investment experience, was justified to meet IIROC's KYC and suitability requirements.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012: Investment Firm Justified in its Collection of "Know Your Client" Information

Feb 10, 2014Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2014-012
Adjudicator: Chantal Bernier
Plain-Language Summary

A customer complained that his investment firm's Know Your Client (KYC) form required an unreasonable amount of personal information, contrary to PIPEDA. The firm argued the information was necessary to comply with regulatory obligations set by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC). The OPC investigated whether the firm collected more information than necessary for legitimate purposes. Ultimately, the OPC found that the firm's collection of detailed financial and personal information, including spousal income and investment experience, was justified to meet IIROC's KYC and suitability requirements.

Key Issues
  • Whether the investment firm explicitly specified the purposes for collecting personal information.
  • Whether the stated purposes for collection were legitimate.
  • Whether the firm collected more personal information than necessary to fulfill those purposes.
  • Whether the collection was a condition of service that violated PIPEDA.
Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2017-14 — Elk Island Public Schools Regional Division No. 14

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

New Brunswick
Subscribers only
Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act

2013-1345-AP-691 — Department of Finance

Subscribe to access New Brunswick decisions.