BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

162 decisions matching
Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

ORDER 2000-014 — Alberta Human Resources and Employment and Chem-Security (Alberta) Ltd.

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

ORDER 2001-002 — Alberta Human Resources and Employment

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

01-33 — BC OIPC order 608

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

ORDER 2001-004 — Workers' Compensation Board

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 2001/018 — Saskatchewan Government Insurance

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Privacy Report MC000029 - 2001-07-09

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

01-32 — BC OIPC order 605

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 2001/019 — SGI

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 2000/024 — City of Yorkton

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

01-30 — BC OIPC order 658

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

01-31 — BC OIPC order 603

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

01-29 — BC OIPC order 653

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Privacy Report PC-010009-1 - 2001-06-27

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

FILE NO. – 2001/014 — Workers' Compensation Board of Saskatchewan

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded
Jun 15, 2001· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Letter of finding regarding the video surveillance issue

Centurion Security Services

The federal Privacy Commissioner investigated a complaint regarding a security company's installation of street surveillance cameras. The Commissioner found that live video feeds of individuals constituted personal information under PIPEDA and that collecting this information for commercial purposes without consent was unlawful. The company was informed that its intended public video surveillance for commercial purposes is not compliant with privacy laws.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded

Letter of finding regarding the video surveillance issue

Jun 15, 2001
Adjudicator: George Radwanski
Plain-Language Summary

The federal Privacy Commissioner investigated a complaint regarding a security company's installation of street surveillance cameras. The Commissioner found that live video feeds of individuals constituted personal information under PIPEDA and that collecting this information for commercial purposes without consent was unlawful. The company was informed that its intended public video surveillance for commercial purposes is not compliant with privacy laws.

Key Issues
  • Definition of personal information under PIPEDA (specifically regarding live video feeds)
  • Application of PIPEDA to commercial activities
  • Consent requirements for collecting personal information
  • Lawfulness of private sector surveillance in public spaces