BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,026 decisions matching
Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Health Information Protection Act

Review Report 222-2018 — Saskatchewan Health Authority

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 026-2019 — Ministry of Social Services

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 152-2019 — Regina Police Service

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4015

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4016

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2019 QCCAI 439 — Ville de Rimouski

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F19-44 — BC OIPC order 2234

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4014

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3873

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F19-43 — BC OIPC order 2233

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4013

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Dec 9, 2019PIPEDA Findings #2019-007· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2019-007: Credit reporting agency is authorized to rely on exemption to consent in disclosing credit information to Statistics Canada

Trans Union of Canada, Inc.

The complainant alleged that Trans Union disclosed his credit file information to Statistics Canada without consent, and that this information was subsequently used to initiate debt collection efforts against him. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) found that Trans Union was authorized to disclose the information under PIPEDA, as Statistics Canada had requested it under the authority of the Statistics Act. The OPC also found no evidence that Statistics Canada disclosed the complainant's information to other institutions for debt collection purposes.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

PIPEDA Findings #2019-007: Credit reporting agency is authorized to rely on exemption to consent in disclosing credit information to Statistics Canada

Dec 9, 2019PIPEDA Findings #2019-007
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Trans Union disclosed his credit file information to Statistics Canada without consent, and that this information was subsequently used to initiate debt collection efforts against him. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) found that Trans Union was authorized to disclose the information under PIPEDA, as Statistics Canada had requested it under the authority of the Statistics Act. The OPC also found no evidence that Statistics Canada disclosed the complainant's information to other institutions for debt collection purposes.

Key Issues
  • Whether Trans Union disclosed personal information without consent contrary to PIPEDA.
  • Whether Statistics Canada used disclosed information for debt collection.
  • Whether the disclosure was authorized by law under PIPEDA.
  • Whether Statistics Canada contravened the Privacy Act in its data collection.
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Dec 9, 2019Statistics Canada· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Statistics Canada: Invasive data initiatives should be redesigned with privacy in mind

Statistics Canada

This investigation examined complaints concerning Statistics Canada's collection of personal financial and credit information from a credit bureau and financial institutions for two projects. The OPC found Statistics Canada had the legal authority for the Credit Information Project, deeming that aspect not well-founded. However, the OPC had serious concerns that the Financial Transactions Project, as originally designed, would have exceeded Statistics Canada's legal authority. As this project was halted before any data was collected, no finding was made. Despite finding no contravention of the Privacy Act, the OPC identified significant privacy concerns regarding necessity, proportionality, and transparency in both projects as originally designed, and made recommendations for improvement.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Statistics Canada: Invasive data initiatives should be redesigned with privacy in mind

Dec 9, 2019Statistics Canada
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation examined complaints concerning Statistics Canada's collection of personal financial and credit information from a credit bureau and financial institutions for two projects. The OPC found Statistics Canada had the legal authority for the Credit Information Project, deeming that aspect not well-founded. However, the OPC had serious concerns that the Financial Transactions Project, as originally designed, would have exceeded Statistics Canada's legal authority. As this project was halted before any data was collected, no finding was made. Despite finding no contravention of the Privacy Act, the OPC identified significant privacy concerns regarding necessity, proportionality, and transparency in both projects as originally designed, and made recommendations for improvement.

Key Issues
  • Legal authority for collecting personal information under the Statistics Act and Privacy Act
  • Necessity and proportionality of collecting sensitive personal information
  • Adequacy of transparency regarding data collection
  • Safeguards for handling collected personal information
Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Health Information Protection Act

Investigation Report 126-2019, 137-2019, 182-2019, 191-2019 — Saskatchewan Health Authority

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3871-F

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.