Updated daily · 21,367 recordsSign in
The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,266 decisions matching
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4284

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4283

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4282

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4232-F

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 27, 2022PIPEDA Findings #2022-006

PIPEDA Findings #2022-006: Investigation into Trimac’s use of an audio and video surveillance device in its truck cabins

Trimac Transportation Services Inc.

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint from a Trimac truck driver concerned about audio and video recording in his truck cabin. The OPC found that while Trimac had legitimate safety and asset protection goals, the continuous audio recording was too intrusive, especially when drivers were off-duty. Trimac was also not initially transparent about using the data for disciplinary purposes, failing to meet consent requirements under PIPEDA. Trimac has since implemented changes, limiting audio recording to on-duty hours and improving data access controls. The OPC found the complaint conditionally resolved regarding the intrusive nature of the recording and resolved regarding the consent issue, accepting Trimac's remedial actions.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2022-006: Investigation into Trimac’s use of an audio and video surveillance device in its truck cabins

Jul 27, 2022PIPEDA Findings #2022-006
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint from a Trimac truck driver concerned about audio and video recording in his truck cabin. The OPC found that while Trimac had legitimate safety and asset protection goals, the continuous audio recording was too intrusive, especially when drivers were off-duty. Trimac was also not initially transparent about using the data for disciplinary purposes, failing to meet consent requirements under PIPEDA. Trimac has since implemented changes, limiting audio recording to on-duty hours and improving data access controls. The OPC found the complaint conditionally resolved regarding the intrusive nature of the recording and resolved regarding the consent issue, accepting Trimac's remedial actions.

Key Issues
  • Appropriateness of continuous audio recording in truck cabins, including during off-duty hours.
  • Whether Trimac provided adequate information about the use of collected data for disciplinary purposes.
  • The proportionality of privacy intrusion versus business benefits.
  • The requirement for employee consent for data collection in an employment context.
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2022 QCCAI 188 — Centre de services scolaire Marie-Victorin

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2022 QCCAI 191 — Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4226

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4281

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4228

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4229

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4227

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanLocal Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 054-2022, 072-2022 — Saskatoon Police Service

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 075-2022 — Saskatchewan Government Insurance

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 22, 20225819-02244

5819-02244 — Export Development Canada

Export Development Canada

The complainant requested a summary of financial assistance provided by Export Development Canada (EDC) to Canadian companies in Honduras over $50,000 from 2009 to 2019. EDC withheld information under exemptions related to confidential business information and disclosure restricted by another law. The Information Commissioner found that EDC failed to demonstrate that the information belonged to EDC as required for the first exemption and that the information was "obtained by" EDC as required for the second exemption. The Commissioner ordered EDC to disclose policy types, policy numbers, and maximum liability amounts.

Quick view

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5819-02244 — Export Development Canada

Jul 22, 20225819-02244
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant requested a summary of financial assistance provided by Export Development Canada (EDC) to Canadian companies in Honduras over $50,000 from 2009 to 2019. EDC withheld information under exemptions related to confidential business information and disclosure restricted by another law. The Information Commissioner found that EDC failed to demonstrate that the information belonged to EDC as required for the first exemption and that the information was "obtained by" EDC as required for the second exemption. The Commissioner ordered EDC to disclose policy types, policy numbers, and maximum liability amounts.

Key Issues
  • Applicability of exemption s. 18.1(1) (confidential financial, commercial, scientific or technical information of EDC)
  • Meaning of "belongs to" in s. 18.1(1) ATIA
  • Interpretation of EDC's Disclosure Policy for confidentiality
  • Applicability of exemption s. 24(1) (disclosure restricted by another law) citing s. 24.3(1) of the Export Development Act
  • Distinction between information "obtained by" and "created by" EDC under s. 24.3(1) of the Export Development Act