Condita Research

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,012 decisions matching
Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F18-22 — BC OIPC order 2055

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3858-I

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3857

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2018-25 — Alberta Corporate Human Resources

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3623-I

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2018 QCCAI 152 — Université du Québec à Montréal

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3856

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3622

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2018 QCCAI 156 — Municipalité d'Ange-Gardien

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3855

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2018 QCCAI 153 — Municipalité d'Ange-Gardien

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

REVIEW REPORT 017-2018 — Ministry of Environment and Water Security Agency

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3621

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Jun 12, 2018Repeat offender· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Repeat offender: CSC unlawfully denies complainant access to his personal information a second time

Correctional Service Canada (CSC)

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada investigated a complaint from a federal inmate who alleged that Correctional Service Canada (CSC) contravened the Privacy Act by denying him access to personal information, specifically video and audio recordings. This was a repeat issue, as similar allegations were found to be well-founded in a previous investigation. While CSC properly exempted some recordings, it failed to respond to some requests entirely and, critically, failed to retrieve and retain requested video recordings before they were overwritten in two instances, despite previous recommendations to improve processes for short-retention period records. The complaint was found well-founded due to these failures to provide timely access.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

Repeat offender: CSC unlawfully denies complainant access to his personal information a second time

Jun 12, 2018Repeat offender
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada investigated a complaint from a federal inmate who alleged that Correctional Service Canada (CSC) contravened the Privacy Act by denying him access to personal information, specifically video and audio recordings. This was a repeat issue, as similar allegations were found to be well-founded in a previous investigation. While CSC properly exempted some recordings, it failed to respond to some requests entirely and, critically, failed to retrieve and retain requested video recordings before they were overwritten in two instances, despite previous recommendations to improve processes for short-retention period records. The complaint was found well-founded due to these failures to provide timely access.

Key Issues
  • Timeliness of responding to access to information requests.
  • Retention and destruction of personal information, particularly video recordings.
  • Appropriate application of exemptions to disclosure.
  • Failure to implement previous recommendations regarding record retrieval.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded
Jun 12, 2018PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002: Company’s re-use of millions of Canadian Facebook user profiles violated privacy law

Profile Technology Ltd.

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated complaints against Profile Technology Ltd. (Profile Technology), a New Zealand-based company, for copying and using personal information from Facebook profiles without consent. The OPC found that Profile Technology's website was not merely a search engine but a social networking site, and that the information was not "publicly available" under PIPEDA. The company's practice of repurposing outdated Facebook data without consent or consideration for privacy settings was deemed inappropriate. Additionally, Profile Technology was found to be retaining help desk ticket information longer than necessary. The OPC concluded that Profile Technology contravened PIPEDA by using and disclosing personal information for purposes not appropriate in the circumstances and without consent.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002: Company’s re-use of millions of Canadian Facebook user profiles violated privacy law

Jun 12, 2018PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated complaints against Profile Technology Ltd. (Profile Technology), a New Zealand-based company, for copying and using personal information from Facebook profiles without consent. The OPC found that Profile Technology's website was not merely a search engine but a social networking site, and that the information was not "publicly available" under PIPEDA. The company's practice of repurposing outdated Facebook data without consent or consideration for privacy settings was deemed inappropriate. Additionally, Profile Technology was found to be retaining help desk ticket information longer than necessary. The OPC concluded that Profile Technology contravened PIPEDA by using and disclosing personal information for purposes not appropriate in the circumstances and without consent.

Key Issues
  • Jurisdiction over a foreign-based organization
  • Definition of "publicly available" information under PIPEDA
  • Requirement for consent for collection and use of personal information
  • Appropriateness of purposes for using personal information