Condita Research

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,144 decisions matching
Flag of Newfoundland and Labrador
Newfoundland and Labrador
Subscribers only
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015

A-2019-017 — Department of Justice and Public Safety

Subscribe to access Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 113-2019 — Ministry of Energy and Resources

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 119-2018 — SaskTel

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 149-2017 — Ministry of Social Services

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3813

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3812-I

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3811-I

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2019 QCCAI 253 — Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Montérégie-Ouest

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3977

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)
Aug 1, 20192019 OIC 1· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2019 OIC 1

federal institution

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline processing an access request from a former employee. The institution argued the request was vexatious, an abuse of the right to access, and made in bad faith due to the requester's previous dismissal and numerous prior requests. The Commissioner found the institution failed to provide sufficient evidence for any of these claims.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2019 OIC 1

Aug 1, 20192019 OIC 1
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline processing an access request from a former employee. The institution argued the request was vexatious, an abuse of the right to access, and made in bad faith due to the requester's previous dismissal and numerous prior requests. The Commissioner found the institution failed to provide sufficient evidence for any of these claims.

Key Issues
  • Whether the request was vexatious
  • Whether the request constituted an abuse of the right of access
  • Whether the request was made in bad faith
  • Whether the institution fulfilled its duty to assist
Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)
Aug 1, 20192019 OIC 2· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2019 OIC 2

institution

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline to act on an access request, alleging it was vexatious, an abuse of the right to request records, and made in bad faith. The requester was a former employee who had filed multiple previous access requests. The Commissioner found the institution failed to prove the request was vexatious, an abuse of the right of access, or made in bad faith, and also failed to demonstrate it fulfilled its duty to assist the requester. The Commissioner denied the institution's application.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2019 OIC 2

Aug 1, 20192019 OIC 2
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline to act on an access request, alleging it was vexatious, an abuse of the right to request records, and made in bad faith. The requester was a former employee who had filed multiple previous access requests. The Commissioner found the institution failed to prove the request was vexatious, an abuse of the right of access, or made in bad faith, and also failed to demonstrate it fulfilled its duty to assist the requester. The Commissioner denied the institution's application.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access request was vexatious.
  • Whether the access request constituted an abuse of the right to access records.
  • Whether the access request was made in bad faith.
  • Whether the institution fulfilled its duty to assist the requester.
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

2019 QCCAI 263 — Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Montérégie-Centre

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-3976-I

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3810-F

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-3809

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.