The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,046 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 25, 2017Early resolved case summary #2017-001Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2017-001: Privacy obligations under PIPEDA apply to financial technology sector

A FinTech organization

A complainant sought to open an online financial investment account with a FinTech organization. To access the investment account management agreement, the complainant was required to provide personal information, some of which was sensitive. After reviewing the agreement, the complainant decided not to open an account and requested deletion of their personal information. The organization cited "regulatory requirements" for the collection. The OPC clarified that while regulatory requirements exist, they apply once an individual becomes a client, not before. The OPC advised the organization to revise its website so prospective clients could review the agreement without prior personal information disclosure. The organization agreed to revise its website and Privacy Policy, leading to an early resolution.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #2017-001: Privacy obligations under PIPEDA apply to financial technology sector

Jul 25, 2017Early resolved case summary #2017-001
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A complainant sought to open an online financial investment account with a FinTech organization. To access the investment account management agreement, the complainant was required to provide personal information, some of which was sensitive. After reviewing the agreement, the complainant decided not to open an account and requested deletion of their personal information. The organization cited "regulatory requirements" for the collection. The OPC clarified that while regulatory requirements exist, they apply once an individual becomes a client, not before. The OPC advised the organization to revise its website so prospective clients could review the agreement without prior personal information disclosure. The organization agreed to revise its website and Privacy Policy, leading to an early resolution.

Key Issues
  • Whether a FinTech organization can require personal information before a prospective client reviews terms and conditions
  • Whether consent under PIPEDA is meaningful if personal information is collected before a user can review service agreements
  • Whether regulatory requirements justify collecting personal information from prospective clients who do not proceed with opening an account
Northwest TerritoriesAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Northwest Territories flag

Review Recommendation 17-165 — Department of Human Resources

Subscribe to open Northwest Territories decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2017-018 — Department of Finance

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Prince Edward IslandFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Prince Edward Island flag

PP-17-001 — Department of Workforce and Advanced Learning

Subscribe to open Prince Edward Island decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaPersonal Information Protection Act
British Columbia flag

P17-03 — BC OIPC order 1958

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-3750

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
New BrunswickRight to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
New Brunswick flag

2016-3311-AP-1792 — Kennebecasis Regional Police Force

Subscribe to open New Brunswick decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Quebec
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 174 — Centre universitaire de santé McGill

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

REVIEW REPORT 059-2017 — Public Complaints Commission

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2017-62 — City of Calgary

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3473

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 177 — COMMISSION ON STANDARDS, EQUITY, HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 263-2016 to 268-2016 — Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 19, 2017Indexed Jun 30, 2026

MyDemocracy website not designed in a privacy sensitive way

Privy Council Office

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint against the Privy Council Office (PCO) regarding its MyDemocracy.ca website. The complainant alleged that the website used "Facebook Connect" tracking, sharing user data with Facebook despite promises of anonymity. The OPC found that the website's design facilitated the disclosure of personal information, including IP addresses, browser characteristics, and for logged-in users, Facebook IDs, to Facebook upon loading the homepage and initiating share actions, without obtaining consent. PCO argued that the design was standard and that the shared data did not constitute identifiable personal information. However, the OPC concluded that this constituted a disclosure of personal information under section 3 of the Privacy Act and that PCO failed to meet its obligations under section 8. The complaint was found to be well-founded, and the OPC reiterated recommendations for PCO to ensure privacy-sensitive design, conduct PIAs, and obtain meaningful consent for future initiatives.

Quick view

Privacy ActWell-founded

MyDemocracy website not designed in a privacy sensitive way

Jul 19, 2017
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint against the Privy Council Office (PCO) regarding its MyDemocracy.ca website. The complainant alleged that the website used "Facebook Connect" tracking, sharing user data with Facebook despite promises of anonymity. The OPC found that the website's design facilitated the disclosure of personal information, including IP addresses, browser characteristics, and for logged-in users, Facebook IDs, to Facebook upon loading the homepage and initiating share actions, without obtaining consent. PCO argued that the design was standard and that the shared data did not constitute identifiable personal information. However, the OPC concluded that this constituted a disclosure of personal information under section 3 of the Privacy Act and that PCO failed to meet its obligations under section 8. The complaint was found to be well-founded, and the OPC reiterated recommendations for PCO to ensure privacy-sensitive design, conduct PIAs, and obtain meaningful consent for future initiatives.

Key Issues
  • Whether the MyDemocracy.ca website's design led to the disclosure of personal information to third parties (Facebook, Google Analytics) without consent.
  • Whether IP addresses, browser characteristics, and unique URLs constitute "personal information" under section 3 of the Privacy Act.
  • Whether the Privy Council Office (PCO) met its obligations under section 8 of the Privacy Act regarding the disclosure of personal information.
  • Whether PCO's amendments to the website and privacy policy were sufficient to obtain meaningful consent for data disclosure.
  • Whether PCO should have conducted a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the MyDemocracy.ca initiative.
  • Whether the collection of demographic information was justified and compliant with relevant standards.
  • Whether the use of Google Analytics complied with the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's (TBS) Standard on Privacy and Web Analytics.
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2017 QCCAI 204 — Commission scolaire de Portneuf

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction