The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,013 decisions matching
QuebecAct respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 317 — Dianova

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Aug 22, 2016PIPEDA Report of Findings #2016-005Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2016-005: Joint investigation of Ashley Madison by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the Australian Privacy Commissioner/Acting Australian Information Commissioner

Avid Life Media Inc. (ALM)

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) jointly investigated Avid Life Media Inc. (ALM), operator of the Ashley Madison dating website, following a massive data breach in 2015 that exposed approximately 36 million user accounts. The investigation focused on ALM's information handling practices, including its security safeguards, data retention policies, email address accuracy, and transparency with users. The OPC found multiple contraventions of PIPEDA, concluding that ALM lacked an adequate security framework, retained personal information indefinitely, charged a fee for account deletion, and failed to ensure the accuracy of email addresses. Furthermore, ALM's use of a deceptive "trusted security award" trust-mark and unclear retention policies invalidated user consent. ALM agreed to implement all recommendations, leading to a "well-founded and conditionally resolved" outcome, and entered into a compliance agreement with the OPC. Corrective measures included enhancing security, revising retention periods, offering free deletion, and improving transparency.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2016-005: Joint investigation of Ashley Madison by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the Australian Privacy Commissioner/Acting Australian Information Commissioner

Aug 22, 2016PIPEDA Report of Findings #2016-005
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) jointly investigated Avid Life Media Inc. (ALM), operator of the Ashley Madison dating website, following a massive data breach in 2015 that exposed approximately 36 million user accounts. The investigation focused on ALM's information handling practices, including its security safeguards, data retention policies, email address accuracy, and transparency with users. The OPC found multiple contraventions of PIPEDA, concluding that ALM lacked an adequate security framework, retained personal information indefinitely, charged a fee for account deletion, and failed to ensure the accuracy of email addresses. Furthermore, ALM's use of a deceptive "trusted security award" trust-mark and unclear retention policies invalidated user consent. ALM agreed to implement all recommendations, leading to a "well-founded and conditionally resolved" outcome, and entered into a compliance agreement with the OPC. Corrective measures included enhancing security, revising retention periods, offering free deletion, and improving transparency.

Key Issues
  • Whether ALM's security safeguards were appropriate to the sensitivity of the information under PIPEDA Principle 4.7.
  • Whether ALM implemented policies and practices to give effect to the Principles, including procedures to protect personal information, under PIPEDA Principle 4.1.4.
  • Whether ALM's indefinite retention of personal information for deactivated or inactive accounts contravened PIPEDA Principle 4.5.
  • Whether ALM's failure to establish maximum retention periods for personal information contravened PIPEDA Principle 4.5.2.
  • Whether ALM's practice of charging a fee for the complete deletion of personal information contravened an individual's right to withdraw consent under PIPEDA Principle 4.3.8.
  • Whether ALM took reasonable steps to ensure personal information (email addresses) was accurate, complete, and up-to-date as necessary for its purposes, taking into account the interests of the individual, under PIPEDA Principle 4.6 and 4.6.1.
  • Whether ALM's consent for the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information was valid, given the nature, purpose, and consequences, under PIPEDA s.6.1 and Principle 4.3.
  • Whether ALM made information about its personal information handling policies and practices readily available and understandable, and did not obtain consent through deception, under PIPEDA Principle 4.8, 4.8.1, and 4.3.5.
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 253 — Télé-Université

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3349

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 165-2016 — Ministry of Finance

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanHealth Information Protection Act
Saskatchewan flag

Investigation Report 030-2016 — Regina Qu'Appelle Regional Health Authority

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2016-33 — Edmonton Police Service

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Northwest TerritoriesAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Northwest Territories flag

Review Recommendation 16-148 — Department of Human Resources

Subscribe to open Northwest Territories decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 239 — Municipalité de Lac-Beauport

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-3348

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 238 — MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FOOD OF QUEBEC

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 250 — Hydro-Québec

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting health and social services information
Quebec flag

2016 QCCAI 255 — Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanHealth Information Protection Act
Saskatchewan flag

REVIEW REPORT 121-2016 — Heartland Regional Health Authority

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2016-32 — Edmonton Police Service

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction