The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,324 decisions matching
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2022 QCCAI 278 — Ville de Laval

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Newfoundland and LabradorAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2015
Newfoundland and Labrador flag

A-2022-021 — Memorial University

Subscribe to open Newfoundland and Labrador decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2022 QCCAI 293 — Ministère de la Sécurité publique (Sûreté du Québec)

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanHealth Information Protection Act
Saskatchewan flag

INVESTIGATION REPORT 081-2022 — Saskatchewan Health Authority

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F22-47 — BC OIPC order 2549

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting health and social services information
Quebec flag

2022 QCCAI 292 — CISSS de la Montérégie-Centre

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2022 QCCAI 325 — Ministère de la Sécurité publique (Sûreté du Québec)

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanHealth Information Protection Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 337-2021 — Ministry of Labour Relations and Workplace Safety

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2022-RTD-07

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

2022 QCCAI 274 — MRC de la Vallée-de-la-Gatineau

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanLocal Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 107-2022 — Rural Municipality of Hazel Dell No. 335

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanHealth Information Protection Act
Saskatchewan flag

Investigation Report 272-2021 — Saskatchewan Health Authority

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Disregard Decision 176-2022, 177-2022, 178-2022 — Saskatchewan Government Insurance

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

F22-46 — BC OIPC order 2548

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Oct 5, 20225820-03832Indexed Jun 30, 2026

A-2020-00034 — Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

The complainant alleged that the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) improperly withheld information related to a grant made to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) under paragraphs 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(d) of the Access to Information Act. The withheld information included details about the OECD's operating expenses, ACOA's contribution, and a statement regarding the OECD. The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) found that neither ACOA nor the OECD provided sufficient evidence to support the application of either exemption. Specifically, the OIC determined that the information did not meet the confidentiality requirements of paragraph 20(1)(b) and that there was no reasonable expectation of harm to negotiations under paragraph 20(1)(d). Consequently, the Commissioner ordered ACOA to disclose the records in their entirety, and ACOA agreed to implement the order.

Quick view

Access to Information ActWell-founded

A-2020-00034 — Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Oct 5, 20225820-03832
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) improperly withheld information related to a grant made to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) under paragraphs 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(d) of the Access to Information Act. The withheld information included details about the OECD's operating expenses, ACOA's contribution, and a statement regarding the OECD. The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) found that neither ACOA nor the OECD provided sufficient evidence to support the application of either exemption. Specifically, the OIC determined that the information did not meet the confidentiality requirements of paragraph 20(1)(b) and that there was no reasonable expectation of harm to negotiations under paragraph 20(1)(d). Consequently, the Commissioner ordered ACOA to disclose the records in their entirety, and ACOA agreed to implement the order.

Key Issues
  • Whether the information constitutes confidential third-party financial, commercial, scientific or technical information under s.20(1)(b) ATIA
  • Whether the information is financial, commercial, scientific or technical
  • Whether the information is confidential by an objective standard
  • Whether the third party supplied the information to a government institution
  • Whether the third party has consistently treated the information as confidential
  • Whether the information could reasonably be expected to interfere with contractual or other negotiations of a third party under s.20(1)(d) ATIA
  • Whether a third party is or will be conducting contractual or other negotiations
  • Whether disclosing the information could interfere with those negotiations
  • Whether there is a reasonable expectation that harm could occur