The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

221 decisions matching
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

FI-02-01 — Department of Education

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

2001-025 — Alberta Human Resources and Employment

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

2001-034 — Foothills School Division #38

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

FI-02-03 — Department of Justice

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

02-11 — BC OIPC order 661

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

02-10 — BC OIPC order 652

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

02-09 — BC OIPC order 649

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Feb 25, 2002Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Privacy Commissioner's finding on Canada Post's National Change of Address service - February 25, 2002

Canada Post

The Privacy Commissioner investigated a complaint regarding Canada Post's National Change of Address (NCOA) service. The service allowed individuals to redirect mail and, with an opt-out clause in fine print, permitted Canada Post to supply new addresses to "mailers" for a fee. The Commissioner found that Canada Post failed to clearly inform customers that their personal information was being sold to organizations like list brokers and direct marketers, and that the consent obtained was not meaningful. Canada Post refused to implement a recommendation for an opt-in checkbox for this disclosure. The Commissioner concluded that Canada Post was in contravention of sections 5(2) and 8 of the Privacy Act for failing to plainly identify the purpose of collection and for disclosing personal information without proper consent.

Quick view

Privacy ActWell-founded

Privacy Commissioner's finding on Canada Post's National Change of Address service - February 25, 2002

Feb 25, 2002
Adjudicator: George Radwanski
Plain-Language Summary

The Privacy Commissioner investigated a complaint regarding Canada Post's National Change of Address (NCOA) service. The service allowed individuals to redirect mail and, with an opt-out clause in fine print, permitted Canada Post to supply new addresses to "mailers" for a fee. The Commissioner found that Canada Post failed to clearly inform customers that their personal information was being sold to organizations like list brokers and direct marketers, and that the consent obtained was not meaningful. Canada Post refused to implement a recommendation for an opt-in checkbox for this disclosure. The Commissioner concluded that Canada Post was in contravention of sections 5(2) and 8 of the Privacy Act for failing to plainly identify the purpose of collection and for disclosing personal information without proper consent.

Key Issues
  • Whether Canada Post adequately informed individuals about the purpose of collecting their new address information for the NCOA service, specifically regarding disclosure to "mailers" for commercial purposes under s.5(2) of the Privacy Act
  • Whether Canada Post obtained valid consent for the disclosure of new addresses to mass mailers and direct marketers under s.8 of the Privacy Act
  • Whether the "opt-out" mechanism used by Canada Post constituted meaningful consent
  • Whether the safeguard of only providing new addresses to mailers who already had the customer's name and old address adequately addressed consent concerns
SaskatchewanLocal Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

FILE NO. – 2001/043 — Resort Village of Big Shell

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

02-08 — BC OIPC order 646

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

2001-028 — Edmonton Catholic Separate School District No. 7

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

02-07 — BC OIPC order 643

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

Order 02-06 — 02-06 — BC OIPC order 640

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
British ColumbiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
British Columbia flag

02-05 — BC OIPC order 636

Subscribe to open British Columbia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Northwest TerritoriesAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Northwest Territories flag

Review Recommendation 02-24 — Department of Health and Social Services

Subscribe to open Northwest Territories decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction