BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1,159 decisions matching
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

Lohse c. CIUSSS de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

Mateescu c. Ville de Montréal

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Review Report 073-2020 — Saskatchewan Health Authority

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order MO-4127

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Nov 16, 20213217-02395· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

3217-02395 — Department of Justice Canada

Department of Justice Canada

The complainant alleged that the Department of Justice Canada failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to the APEC conference, trade agreements, and the Hughes Inquiry. The department initially stated no records could be found. However, during the investigation, it was revealed that the appropriate sector was not tasked until much later, eventually leading to the retrieval of over 41,000 pages. The Information Commissioner found the initial search unreasonable.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

3217-02395 — Department of Justice Canada

Nov 16, 20213217-02395
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Department of Justice Canada failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to the APEC conference, trade agreements, and the Hughes Inquiry. The department initially stated no records could be found. However, during the investigation, it was revealed that the appropriate sector was not tasked until much later, eventually leading to the retrieval of over 41,000 pages. The Information Commissioner found the initial search unreasonable.

Key Issues
  • Reasonableness of the search conducted by the institution.
  • Timeliness of the institution's response.
  • Adequacy of the institution's estimate for processing remaining records.
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

Constantinescu c. Ministère de la Sécurité publique (Sûreté du Québec)

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

REVIEW REPORT 009-2021 — Saskatchewan Government Insurance

Subscribe to access Saskatchewan decisions.

Flag of Alberta
Alberta
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F2021-43 — Children's Services

Subscribe to access Alberta decisions.

Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Nov 15, 20215820-01594· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

5820-01594 — Library and Archives Canada

Library and Archives Canada

The complainant alleged that Library and Archives Canada (LAC) failed to respond to an access request within the statutory time limits. LAC initially claimed a 565-day extension, which was previously found to be reasonable. However, LAC missed the extended deadline of September 18, 2020. The Information Commissioner found that LAC was in deemed refusal and ordered the institution to complete the processing of the request forthwith.

Quick View

Access to Information ActWell-founded

5820-01594 — Library and Archives Canada

Nov 15, 20215820-01594
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that Library and Archives Canada (LAC) failed to respond to an access request within the statutory time limits. LAC initially claimed a 565-day extension, which was previously found to be reasonable. However, LAC missed the extended deadline of September 18, 2020. The Information Commissioner found that LAC was in deemed refusal and ordered the institution to complete the processing of the request forthwith.

Key Issues
  • Timeliness of response to access request
  • Deemed refusal of access under subsection 10(3)
  • Adequacy of reasons for delay
  • LAC's obligations under the Access to Information Act
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector

Bélair c. Relais Expert-Conseil inc.

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

White c. Ville de Montréal (SPVM)

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of Quebec
Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information

Décision 1013761-S — MRC des Collines-de-l'Outaouais

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.

Flag of British Columbia
British Columbia
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

F21-58 — BC OIPC order 2450

Subscribe to access British Columbia decisions.

Flag of Ontario
Ontario
Subscribers only
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Order PO-4210

Subscribe to access Ontario decisions.

Quebec
Subscribers only
Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector

J.B. c. Carmichael-Moreau

Subscribe to access Quebec decisions.