The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1,249 decisions matching
SaskatchewanLocal Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 200-2020 — Northern Village of Pinehouse

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanLocal Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 261-2021, 001-2021 - PART II — Rural Municipality of Lumsden No. 189

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanHealth Information Protection Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 077-2020 — Saskatchewan Health Authority

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
AlbertaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Alberta flag

F2021-44 — Alberta Justice and Solicitor General

Subscribe to open Alberta decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Northwest TerritoriesAccess to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Northwest Territories flag

21-261 — Department of Infrastructure

Subscribe to open Northwest Territories decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

Gagnon c. CISSS Chaudière-Appalaches

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Nova ScotiaFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Nova Scotia flag

21-14 — Natural Resources and Renewables

Subscribe to open Nova Scotia decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

INVESTIGATION REPORT 074-2020 — Saskatchewan Power Corporation

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order PO-4211

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

Lupien c. Ville de Ste-Adèle

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

Lohse c. CIUSSS de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
QuebecAct respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information
Quebec flag

Mateescu c. Ville de Montréal

Subscribe to open Quebec decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
SaskatchewanLocal Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Saskatchewan flag

Review Report 073-2020 — Saskatchewan Health Authority

Subscribe to open Saskatchewan decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
OntarioMunicipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
Ontario flag

Order MO-4127

Subscribe to open Ontario decisions.

Unlock this jurisdiction
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Nov 16, 20213217-02395Indexed Jun 30, 2026

3217-02395 — Department of Justice Canada

Department of Justice Canada

The complainant alleged that the Department of Justice Canada (Justice) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference and the Hughes Inquiry. Initially, Justice stated it could not locate any responsive records. However, during the OIC's investigation, it was discovered that Justice had not tasked the National Litigation Sector (NLS), which was identified as the most appropriate Office of Primary Interest. After being tasked, the NLS located over 40,000 pages of responsive records. The Commissioner concluded that Justice did not conduct a reasonable search and found the complaint to be well founded. The Commissioner also found Justice's estimated processing time of 55 months to be unreasonable and recommended a final response by September 4, 2023.

Quick view

Access to Information ActWell-founded

3217-02395 — Department of Justice Canada

Nov 16, 20213217-02395
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Department of Justice Canada (Justice) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference and the Hughes Inquiry. Initially, Justice stated it could not locate any responsive records. However, during the OIC's investigation, it was discovered that Justice had not tasked the National Litigation Sector (NLS), which was identified as the most appropriate Office of Primary Interest. After being tasked, the NLS located over 40,000 pages of responsive records. The Commissioner concluded that Justice did not conduct a reasonable search and found the complaint to be well founded. The Commissioner also found Justice's estimated processing time of 55 months to be unreasonable and recommended a final response by September 4, 2023.

Key Issues
  • Whether the Department of Justice Canada conducted a reasonable search for records
  • Whether the National Litigation Sector (NLS) was appropriately tasked for the search
  • Whether the institution's estimated processing time for the records was reasonable