BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Jun 26, 2024· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Investigation into the denial of access to a child’s personal information by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)

The complainant requested his minor child's passport application from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), citing a court order granting him access to his children's information. IRCC denied the request, stating the child's consent was required. The OPC found that while the complainant had legal authorization to act on his child's behalf, the request was not made for the child's benefit or best interests, a key condition under the Privacy Regulations. Therefore, the OPC concluded that the complainant did not have a right of access to the child's personal information.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Investigation into the denial of access to a child’s personal information by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada

Jun 26, 2024
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant requested his minor child's passport application from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), citing a court order granting him access to his children's information. IRCC denied the request, stating the child's consent was required. The OPC found that while the complainant had legal authorization to act on his child's behalf, the request was not made for the child's benefit or best interests, a key condition under the Privacy Regulations. Therefore, the OPC concluded that the complainant did not have a right of access to the child's personal information.

Key Issues
  • Whether a parent has an automatic right of access to a minor child's personal information under the Privacy Act.
  • Interpretation of the Privacy Regulations regarding requests made on behalf of a minor.
  • Whether the complainant's request served the child's best interests.
  • The decision-making capacity of a minor regarding their personal information.
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Feb 28, 2024· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Investigation of the Department of National Defence’s refusal to disclose personal information of a deceased individual

Department of National Defence

A representative acting for the executor of an estate requested personal information about a deceased individual from the Department of National Defence (DND). DND determined the representative was not entitled to the information under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations because they did not sufficiently demonstrate a connection between the information sought and the administration of the estate. While DND processed the request informally and disclosed some information under another provision of the Act, they did not clearly state the grounds for refusal. The OPC found the complaint not well-founded as the representative failed to adequately articulate and substantiate the estate's purposes and how the records would serve them.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Investigation of the Department of National Defence’s refusal to disclose personal information of a deceased individual

Feb 28, 2024
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

A representative acting for the executor of an estate requested personal information about a deceased individual from the Department of National Defence (DND). DND determined the representative was not entitled to the information under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations because they did not sufficiently demonstrate a connection between the information sought and the administration of the estate. While DND processed the request informally and disclosed some information under another provision of the Act, they did not clearly state the grounds for refusal. The OPC found the complaint not well-founded as the representative failed to adequately articulate and substantiate the estate's purposes and how the records would serve them.

Key Issues
  • Whether the representative was authorized to make a request on behalf of the deceased under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations for the purpose of administering the estate.
  • Whether the representative sufficiently demonstrated a connection between the information sought and the administration of the deceased's estate.
  • Whether DND properly notified the representative of the refusal and the basis for it.
  • Whether DND properly handled the request informally.