
Investigation into the denial of access to a child’s personal information by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
The complainant, a father involved in a custody dispute, submitted an ATIP request to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) for his minor child's passport application, which had been submitted by his former spouse. He provided a court order authorizing him to obtain his children's information from third parties. IRCC denied the request, stating that the child's consent was required. The complainant alleged that IRCC improperly denied access despite the court order. The OPC investigated whether the complainant had a right of access under paragraph 10(a) of the Privacy Regulations, which allows access on behalf of a minor under certain conditions. The OPC found that while the child was a minor and the complainant had legal authorization to administer the child's affairs, the request was not made on the child's behalf, but rather for the complainant's own interests. Therefore, the third condition of paragraph 10(a) was not met, and IRCC's denial was deemed reasonable.
- 1Whether the complainant had a right of access to his child’s personal information under section 10 of the Privacy Regulations
- 2Whether the child was a minor at the time of the ATIP request
- 3Whether the complainant had legal authorization to administer the child's affairs
- 4Whether the complainant exercised the right of access on the minor’s behalf
- 5Whether the child had the decision-making capacity to provide consent for the release of their personal information
- Access to minor's records: Access denied, as request not on child's behalf
- Application of Privacy Regs 10(a): Conditions for access not met
Complaint not well-founded
The OPC found that the complainant's request for his child's personal information was not made on the child's behalf, failing to meet a key condition of paragraph 10(a) of the Privacy Regulations. Additionally, the OPC concluded that IRCC was reasonable in requiring the child's consent, given the child's age and demonstrated capacity for decision-making.
- s.12(1) Privacy Act
- s.8 Privacy Act
- s.10(a) Privacy Regulations
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro