
Investigation of the Department of National Defence’s refusal to disclose personal information of a deceased individual
A representative, on behalf of a deceased member's estate executor, requested personal information from the Department of National Defence (DND) related to an investigation into allegations against the deceased. DND processed the request informally and disclosed some information under subparagraph 8(2)(m)(i) of the Privacy Act, but did not explicitly state its refusal to process the request formally under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations. The OPC investigated whether the representative was entitled to make the request for the purpose of administering the estate. The OPC found that while the representative was authorized to administer the estate, they did not sufficiently demonstrate a connection between the requested information and the administration of the estate. Therefore, the complaint was not well-founded, as the representative failed to meet the requirements of paragraph 10(b) of the Regulations.
- 1Whether the representative was authorized to make a request on behalf of the deceased under paragraph 10(b) of the Regulations
- 2Whether the request related only to the administration of the deceased's estate under paragraph 10(b) of the Regulations
- 3Whether DND complied with section 16 of the Privacy Act regarding refusal notifications
- 4Whether DND properly processed the request informally without explicit written consent and notification of rights
- Right to make request: Representative not entitled to make request under 10(b)
- Connection to estate administration: Insufficient connection demonstrated
- Complaint outcome: Complaint not well-founded
Complaint not well-founded
The OPC found that the representative did not sufficiently articulate or substantiate the precise purposes of the estate and how the requested records would further those purposes, failing the 'only for the purpose of such administration' test under paragraph 10(b) of the Privacy Regulations.
- s.3 Privacy Act
- s.12(1) Privacy Act
- s.8(2)(m)(i) Privacy Act
- s.16 Privacy Act
- s.22 Privacy Act
- s.26 Privacy Act
- s.27 Privacy Act
- s.10(b) Privacy Regulations
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro